2024-05-01 [08:07:42.0375] anyone else planning to join today? Richard Gibson ljharb [08:08:57.0745] yes sorry [08:09:01.0494] ^ jugglinmike [08:52:43.0459] following up from today's meeting, we'd like to find out if any implementations are actually running the tests in `implementation-contributed` currently. it sounds like SpiderMonkey is not. [08:54:21.0257] cc shu linusg JaseW for V8, LibJS, Boa šŸ˜„ - I'll ask in the webkit slack as well [08:55:06.0647] it seems like the current state of it is a years-outdated copy of some V8 and WebKit tests [08:55:31.0744] LibJS never has AFAICT, but it has its own tests downstream [08:56:41.0069] https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/tree/master/Userland/Libraries/LibJS/Tests [08:57:32.0179] ptomato: could you ask Kevin Ness for Boa, heā€™s been maintaining the test262 harness and implementation for a while now, Iā€™m not 100% sure and not at a computer. [09:38:23.0988] ptomato: V8 doesn't AFAICT [09:38:59.0637] ptomato: that may or may not be intentional, i don't know. the test runner only picks up tests in `test/` [09:40:37.0792] what do you have in mind for `implementation-contributed/`? [09:44:51.0970] we're deciding whether to move stuff to staging, or to just delete the dir [09:45:23.0839] * we're deciding whether to move stuff to staging, or to just delete the dir (or a secret third option we haven't figured out yet) [15:32:31.0287] put up https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/4069 for Promise.try, hopefully it's a quick review 2024-05-02 [10:24:40.0691] sounds like Boa does not run implementation-contributed and JSC does not even import it 2024-05-06 [08:32:30.0210] Here's the tracking bug for SpiderMonkey test262 failures: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652780 2024-05-14 [15:22:36.0321] https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/4049 seems good to land to me; anyone else want to review? [15:34:37.0967] I did not go over each numerical result in the numerical tests, but otherwise I already reviewed it 2024-05-22 [23:18:37.0359] i'll miss the first half of the meeting tomorrow [05:53:11.0347] I'll unfortunately have to miss the second half :-( [07:06:17.0526] ljharb: ptomato I am sick since yesterday, should we postpone it to next week? [07:21:00.0759] > <@idimitriou:igalia.com> ljharb: ptomato I am sick since yesterday, should we postpone it to next week? I'll be on vacation next week but you can feel free to go ahead without me [07:24:46.0155] > <@pchimento:igalia.com> I'll be on vacation next week but you can feel free to go ahead without me Ah sorry, I forgot. In that case nevermind, maybe it's best not to postpone with such a late notice - I'm not even a maintainer, just interested. :) [07:24:56.0750] unless anyone else is attending today, doesn't seem like it makes sense to go ahead [07:25:15.0319] As you prefer, I would attend next week. [07:26:21.0553] I'll pop into the meeting room at the usual time and see if anyone's there. if not, then let's postpone [07:27:13.0431] if you meet next week, remember to draft a status update for the TC39 plenary šŸ˜„ [08:11:17.0074] ok, I'm assuming we're postponing until next week [08:46:00.0699] i just got back; sounds like we'll meet next week. i'll move the event invite. also i'll drop the status update in here 2024-05-29 [08:10:46.0139] says ā€œwaiting for moderatorā€ in the meeting, so i guess we wonā€™t be meeting today either [08:11:04.0261] I'm seeing the same thing [14:22:18.0695] hello all! Back on the internet after a nice post-Igalia sabbatical. Looks like there wasn't a meeting today but will look forward to the next one - got some time to help with reviews in my future :)