01:27 | <bakkot> | random q: in step 3.1 of Formatter in the console spec, it calls String(arg) : https://console.spec.whatwg.org/#formatter |
01:28 | <bakkot> | this implies to me that console.log(">%s<", ({ toString: () => { return 'custom' } })) should print >custom< , which it does in FF, but not in Chrome (which instead prints >Object< ) |
01:28 | <bakkot> | am I misreading, or is Chrome not following the spec? |
10:56 | <Luca Casonato> | Could someone explain why running the below snippet on https://google.com results in different output than https://source.chromium.org/? As far as I can tell neither are in quirks mode.
|
10:56 | <Luca Casonato> | google.com logs
while source.chromium.org logs
|
11:00 | <Luca Casonato> | Oh, source.chromium.org has a custom queueMicrotask . Should have looked for that right away. Please ignore :-) |
12:06 | <freddy> | this is why I test on example.com (.net, .org) :P |
15:12 | <smaug> | anyone recalls why getElementsByTagName and such didn't end up to ShadowRoot? |
15:12 | <smaug> | ah, I guess because of HTMLCollection |
18:15 | <sideshowbarker> | https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68742660/when-response-text-promise-will-reject |
19:29 | <travisleithead> | 👋 |
19:31 | <Seirdy> | hey |
19:31 | <Seirdy> | just copying a question from irc: |
19:31 | <Seirdy> | question about the navigate-to csp directive (https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/#directive-navigate-to): if i understand it correctly, this doesn't restrict links the user can click on to navigate; it only restricts navigations initiated by JS, redirects, and forms. is this accurate, or is its scope broader? |
19:40 | <Seirdy> | also: w3.org directed me to irc.w3.org and #whatwg on fleenode. irc.w3.org is mostly empty. freenode -> libera happened, and i was directed from irc to matrix here. so...are questions about w3c specs welcome here, or is there a better place? |
19:47 | <jgraham> | Seirdy: W3C is theoretically mostly still on IRC, although it's fragmented a bit. You can bridge from matrix to the IRC server if you want to have a single interface. I think the answer to "are questions about W3C specs welcome here" is "it depends on the spec". |
19:47 | <jgraham> | I think there are some people who can answer webappsec questions, and I don't know of a better place. |
19:51 | <Seirdy> |
|
19:51 | <Seirdy> | i generally prefer using weechat anyway |
19:53 | <jgraham> | Seirdy: I"m in #w3c#webdriver:matrix.org and there are definitely more than 3 members |
19:53 | <Alan Stearns> | #css currently has 116 people |
19:53 | <Seirdy> | wait what |
19:54 | <Seirdy> | oh wait my usercount script us messed up |
19:54 | <Seirdy> | nevermind |
19:54 | <Seirdy> | kids, don't code while sleep deprived or you'll end up like me |
19:57 | <Seirdy> | ok thanks guys, cya. |