| 05:17 | <annevk> | Jake Archibald: it tests that foO gets through Access-Control-Allow-Methods: foO, which doesn't work for the same reason I think |
| 05:22 | <Jake Archibald> | annevk that test would pass if the ACAM check was case insensitive. Chrome is currently allowing methods that the server didn't allow, which seems bad 😬 |
| 05:27 | <Jake Archibald> | Ah, Hiroshi has tests for that https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/29680/files#diff-1166b97b413b5886babae2b10bae70526b1b9ff70b5feeb3c658177a2fa3f556R79 |
| 05:33 | <annevk> | Those look good! |
| 06:48 | <sideshowbarker> | And to merge "Obsolete features" back into the main body of the specification |
| 06:51 | <sideshowbarker> | This is another reason why I don't think MDN should be linking to any spec parts about obsolete content to begin with, and why I never added such links myself. But others see it differently, so we do have a few of those in MDN |
| 06:56 | <annevk> | sideshowbarker: interesting, kinda surprising MDN cares about them indeed, but we should preserve IDs anyway as source code or bug comments are likely to link it too |
| 07:02 | <sideshowbarker> | The main thing I can think of is to split each element section into two sections, one for authors and one for implementers |
| 11:11 | <hsivonen> | Last night, an ominous though occurred to me, but, fortunately, things are OK: https://hsivonen.com/test/moz/meta/after-head-variable-with-crlf.php?start=1023 and https://hsivonen.com/test/moz/meta/after-head-variable-with-crlf.php?start=1024 . (For a moment I though that WebKit and Blink might counting after CRLF normalization. Fortunately not.) |
| 18:15 | <Domenic> | Jake Archibald: perhaps we can store an opaque flag on the history entry that would avoid revealing it in those cases? |
| 18:19 | <Domenic> | https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7116#issuecomment-928659511 -- I couldn't find the issue about clarifying document conformance requirements vs UA conformance requirements now, but did we conclude how to deal with cases like this? |
| 18:19 | <zcorpan> | thanks |
| 18:25 | <wanderview> | Domenic: aren't you on vacation? |