| 00:08 | <TabAtkins> | This is generally where we discuss webidl stuff, yeah |
| 00:09 | <TabAtkins> | Or just in the issue tracker itself, which is probably better for a design discussion like what you seem to be talking about |
| 09:58 | <徐高銘> | hi,all I found an accident https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/issues/15096 |
| 12:45 | <zcorpan> | How are we using the "impacts documentation" label? Should the label be removed after fixing MDN? (I guess maybe not, since MDN is probably not the only interested party for documentation) |
| 12:46 | <zcorpan> | Should there be a separate "needs edits on MDN" label? |
| 12:48 | <sideshowbarker> | yeah, I use/follow the “impacts documentation” label to keep track of changes that will require updates to MDN |
| 12:49 | <sideshowbarker> | in theory it could affect other docs, but in practice I don’t know of any docs affected other than MDN |
| 12:50 | <sideshowbarker> | and personally I have never removed that label from anything, even after changes to MDN have been made |
| 12:51 | <sideshowbarker> | IMHO we don’t need a separate "needs edits on MDN" label, because that’s what "impacts documentation" already is in practice |
| 12:52 | <zcorpan> | ok. so leaving the label means there may be closed issues with the label that still needs MDN edits, and some that don't |
| 12:52 | <sideshowbarker> | yeah |
| 12:52 | <sideshowbarker> | (incidentally, note that we also have the @whatwg/documentation team that can be Cc’d on issues and PRs) |
| 12:54 | <zcorpan> | Removing the label seems nice though since then 0 closed issues with the label = good code health |
| 12:55 | <sideshowbarker> | yeah, I agree it would |
| 12:55 | <sideshowbarker> | one wrinkle in general is that somebody would need to remember to actually remove the label |
| 12:56 | <zcorpan> | The documentation team can have a regular triage of closed issues |
| 12:57 | <sideshowbarker> | yeah I would certainly be happy to participate in that |
| 13:01 | zcorpan | finds https://github.com/whatwg/meta/issues/111 |
| 13:04 | <sideshowbarker> | I guess we’ve been doing this for too long… I think I can’t remember stuff we did in 2018 any more clearly than I can 2006 😆 |
| 13:05 | <zcorpan> | recent years is a blur |
| 20:04 | <ntim> | Domenic: I've updated https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7134 |
| 23:18 | <Luca Casonato> | It looks like api.csswg.org may be having some issues. My CI runs are failing on the fetch spec: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/runs/5472598698?check_suite_focus=true |