| 09:33 | <sideshowbarker> | https://drafts.csswg.org/ currently wedged again |
| 09:35 | <sideshowbarker> | seriously considering to propose that for MDN and BCD we switch over to using https://andreubotella.com/csswg-auto-build/ URLs instead |
| 09:37 | <Andreu Botella> | That's maybe making it more official than I'm comfortable with atm 😅 |
| 09:39 | <sideshowbarker> | Andreu Botella: well I was next gonna ask if you wouldn’t mind if I forked it to make https://github.com/w3c/css-specs/ 😆 But I take it that you’d probably rather I didn’t do that |
| 09:43 | <Andreu Botella> | Before making it a W3C thing, we should definitely ask Peter Linss and see who is willing to fund work for the current server |
| 09:48 | <sideshowbarker> | well if the current server is broken by design, and we have an existence proof that we can achieve the same end result serving from GitHub pages — as we do for specs for every single other W3C working group — then I’m not sure it’s even very principled to encourage anybody to fund work on the current server. It’s not even clear to me what the money would be spent on, or how throwing more money at it would fix the underlying design problems. The money would be spent on completely rewriting it all? Or what? |
| 09:57 | <Andreu Botella> | I'm worried about making this setup serve the specs at their officialâ„¢ URLs, because Bikeshed's xref database is built by scraping the specs with Shepherd, so commits that introduce xrefs to a newly introduced term in a different spec will not show up until the next build |
| 09:58 | <Andreu Botella> | but I'm not sure if plinss's server handles this at all currently |
| 09:58 | <sideshowbarker> | I see |
| 12:49 | <Luca Casonato> | Could I get some reviews on https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1098 ? |
| 15:20 | <ntim> | annevk: hi, can you please merge/review https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7134 when you have time? |
| 16:27 | <Dominic Farolino> | Is https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-location-reload the only place that POST resubmission is defined in HTML? |
| 16:42 | <annevk> | Dominic Farolino: sounds plausible |
| 16:42 | <annevk> | Dominic Farolino: user-initiated navigations aren't really covered yet |
| 16:51 | <annevk> | ntim: nice catch from Domenic on the IDL attribute. Oops 🙂 |
| 16:54 | <Domenic> | I plan to make user-initiated navigations a bit more covered when merging https://wicg.github.io/navigation-api/#user-initiated-patches into HTML |