| 06:39 | <Yoav Weiss> | annevk: Added a label to all remaining issues in https://github.com/w3c/preload/issues but it seems like I can't transfer this issue to a repo in another org |
| 06:40 | <Yoav Weiss> | Not sure if this is a permissions thing, and if e.g. I give you permissions on the preload repo, you'd be able to get them transferred |
| 06:40 | <annevk> | Yoav Weiss: oh sorry, I'm pretty sure you cannot transfer issues across organizations |
| 06:40 | <Yoav Weiss> | hmm. |
| 06:41 | <Yoav Weiss> | In that case, it may be easiest for me to open new ones, pointing at these (by then archived) ones |
| 06:41 | <annevk> | Yeah, the alternative would be transferring the repository, but that doesn't seem great |
| 06:42 | <Yoav Weiss> | yeah, agree |
| 06:44 | <annevk> | zcorpan: hgroup styles removed is a nice cleanup |
| 06:51 | <Yoav Weiss> | annevk: Can you add a "preload" label on https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7887 https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7888 and https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7889? |
| 07:08 | <annevk> | I've added the label I suggested yesterday to a bunch of issues, including those (not entirely sure it's the best name as "resource hints" is not a term we use in HTML; so if anyone has something better let me know) |
| 10:50 | <Noam Rosenthal> | I think "resource hints" is the best name, as it describes the adjacent spec (https://w3c.github.io/resource-hints/) which some of those still link to. The term Is used in HTML when linking to that spec |
| 12:02 | <annevk> | Ah okay, I wasn't sure, though it seems that over time that specification might get fully integrated |
| 12:13 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Ah okay, I wasn't sure, though it seems that over time that specification might get fully integrated |
| 13:25 | <sideshowbarker> | PSA for anybody interested in committer/issue/PR metrics for repos you manage or contribute to…
…so, I wrote a tool that generates data and graphs to answer those questions. |
| 13:31 | <Arthur Hemery> | annevk: Regarding https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6364, we've got feedback from Google, Facebook and Zoom who all seem to agree that the COOP: Popups proposal would work for them. Do you have any other group you'd like to verify that solution works for? Given the complexity of the topic and the length of the discussion, I don't really know how to get smaller entities feedback. |
| 14:23 | <annevk> | Arthur Hemery: I guess auth0 might be good to ask? Perhaps a way to get some attention from the login community would be a short email to https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fed-id/? |
| 14:34 | <Arthur Hemery> | Thanks for the pointers, doing that now :) |
| 20:42 | <peterv> | Domenic: DefaultValue is also used for dictionary members, which can't be undefined 🙄 |
| 20:45 | <Domenic> | peterv: sure, not everything that's disallowed must be grammatically disallowed. |
| 20:45 | <peterv> | yeah, I know, just that we'll need some more prose |
| 20:45 | <peterv> | I thought this would be trivial grammar change |