| 01:21 | <Domenic> | annevk: if you were to create a HTTP header referring to a URL's query/search component, would you use a name containing "query" or "search"? (https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/pull/183 for full context if you're interested.) |
| 04:25 | <Scottsdale > | ππππToday is my most happiest day, I never believe in making money in Bitcoin investment until a friend of mine invested with him and got his profit and I decided to give it a try and wow it works out for me, I'm damn happy I can't believe when I opened my Bitcoin wallet and saw my profit I was short of words, thank you so much Sir God bless you, you can also invest with him ππππππ https://t.me/+fg0XTHR8CAo4Y2Fk https://t.me/+fg0XTHR8CAo4Y2Fk @FLORAGORDON |
| 09:57 | <smaug> | Jake Archibald: (I was looking at some of my ancient tests) looks like Chrome has changed session history behavior on this case from the old WebKit model to Presto model: http://mozilla.pettay.fi/moztests/history2/Start.html I think we don't want to spec either one of those. The testcase is about dynamically added iframes |
| 13:26 | <Jake Archibald> | smaug: yeah, I ran across this one too. Firefox's model is the sensible one, and it's what I put in PR. |
| 13:28 | <Jake Archibald> | The current spec seems to hint at the Firefox behaviour here too. |
| 13:32 | <Jake Archibald> | Ah, ok, this bit isn't handled in the PR. I need to make sure it explicitly removes those history entries when the iframe is removed. |
| 13:58 | <Jake Archibald> | Oh, no, I misread, it's handled in the current PR (the Firefox model) https://whatpr.org/html/6315/document-sequences.html#destroy-the-nested-navigable |
| 21:33 | <Lorin> | Is there a similar discussion platform for CSS spec? |
| 21:39 | <aja> | https://matrix.to/#/#w3c_css:matrix.org |
| 21:39 | <aja> | specs (plural) |
| 21:44 | <aja> | above room is primarily for css wg meetings, though. most discussion is in github PRs |