WHATWG
2022-09-22
plaintext logs
prev next
source on github
01:55
<jugglinmike>
TabAtkins: To test support for specific counter-style names of CSS's list-style-type property, I'm thinking that you'd need a visual reference test (since it's supposed to use "decimal" without computing to "decimal" for unrecognized values https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-counter-styles-3/#typedef-counter-style). Does that sound right to you?
04:36
<TabAtkins>
Yeah, likely. The various built-ins aren't different enough in width to be reliable detectable that way.
07:22
<hacknorris>
Idk if its correct place but someone knows any holes in sms protocol? Dm me cause yk...
07:24
<hacknorris>
Best would be rce i think...
16:29
<jugglinmike>
Yeah, likely. The various built-ins aren't different enough in width to be reliable detectable that way.
Thanks!
17:37
<Andreu Botella>
annevk: isn't there a "with" missing in https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8309 ?
17:40
<annevk>
Andreu Botella: ouch, I'll PR
17:42
<hacknorris>
can i here ask normal coding question or is it too much offtopic ?
17:44
<annevk>
hacknorris: that's fine, you might not always get a reply though :-)
17:44
<hacknorris>
ok, about css
17:45
<hacknorris>
cause i make a website
17:45
<annevk>
Andreu Botella: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8311
17:45
<hacknorris>
and i have image slideshow with 6 pics of cats. but after once its displayed only part stays looped
17:46
<hacknorris>
here is page on my local server : http://89.76.123.229:8000/dumm.html
17:47
<hacknorris>
if ya delete /dumm.html you get ftp server with source of everything hosted
17:47
<hacknorris>
or alt+shift+s or how it goes
17:49
<hacknorris>
any ideas to properly loooop?
17:49
<hacknorris>
without later-missing images?
17:59
<hacknorris>
like all 6 appears normally, first loop ends, then one appears normally, then one for millisecond and repeat 3 times from (then one appears), then repeat previous things (from then one appears) infinite
18:00
<hacknorris>
moment
18:00
<hacknorris>
i'll draw sheme of this bug
18:02
<hacknorris>
*or code
18:04
<hacknorris>
draw.picture.1();
draw.picture.2();
draw.picture.3();
draw.picture.4();
draw.picture.5();
draw.picture.6();
while (1) {
draw.picture.1();
draw.picture.2();
draw.picture.3();
draw.picture.4();
};
18:04
<hacknorris>
like this above. code of page below
18:04
<hacknorris>
http://89.76.123.229:8000/dumm.html this and view source
18:05
<hacknorris>
someone ?
18:24
<hacknorris>
hmm?
19:56
<TabAtkins>
annevk: hacknorris is asking for help with illegal activity; go ahead and ban them (I've reported their account)
20:11
<jugglinmike>
TabAtkins: What about using something like <ol start="1234567890"> ? How confident would you be that any arbitrary counter-style would render at a different width from decimal for a large number like that?
20:15
<TabAtkins>
hmmmm, actually not sure.
20:17
<TabAtkins>
jugglinmike: One issue is that not all query styles are defined out to that value (roman, hebrew, etc)
20:18
<jugglinmike>
Ah, good point
20:19
<jugglinmike>
I have a reliable test using @counter-style, but that's of limited use since Safari hasn't implemented @counter-style yet
20:23
<jugglinmike>
But actually, if it's the implementation of @counter-style that causes CSS.supports to return true for all values, then maybe I can just combine those heuristics in one test