WHATWG on 2022-10-17

09:56	<sideshowbarker>	Luca Casonato: Domenic Sorry that the misnaming situation for instance methods in MDN hasn’t been fixed. I will try to get it made a higher priority. I guess I’ve not done enough recently to push for it to happen, but that’s partly out of fatigue from having made an effort in the past but not ending up with anything to show for it.
10:31	<sideshowbarker>	Domenic: The spec formerly had a restriction that disallowed `script` elements from having a `src` attribute unless the `type` attribute was a JavaScript MIME type. It’s gone now. Do you remember if it was dropped intentionally? Or was it dropped as an (unintended) side effect of other changes? I feel like maybe I’ve asked you this before, but if so, I can’t remember now what the resolution was. Immediate context is https://github.com/validator/validator/issues/1379
10:52	<annevk>	sideshowbarker: that does not seem intentional, would be interesting to know how that got lost (perhaps with module scripts?)
10:52	<annevk>	We should probably modify this sentence to cover all non-class/module scripts: For import map script elements, the src, async, nomodule, defer, crossorigin, integrity, and referrerpolicy attributes must not be specified.
11:17	<sideshowbarker>	sideshowbarker: that does not seem intentional, would be interesting to know how that got lost (perhaps with module scripts?) OK yeah I think that must be where it got dropped
11:26	<sideshowbarker>	We should probably modify this sentence to cover all non-class/module scripts: For import map script elements, the src, async, nomodule, defer, crossorigin, integrity, and referrerpolicy attributes must not be specified. OK, so maybe how about just this: For import map script elements and data blocks, the src, async, nomodule, defer, crossorigin, integrity, and referrerpolicy attributes must not be specified.
11:31	<annevk>	sideshowbarker: that works too, I suspect it applies to some of the other new types Google is proposing, but maybe it's better to enumerate this way
11:34	<sideshowbarker>	well, alternatively, we could go back to saying “if the value of the type attribute is not a JavaScript MIME type, the src attribute must not be specified” — as we had previously
11:49	<annevk>	I think we do want to say something about all attributes, but if we negate on type or not doesn't really matter to me
11:59	<sideshowbarker>	OK
11:59	<sideshowbarker>	well, I’ll open a PR with a patch that we can start from and then we can go from there
12:03	<sideshowbarker>	Domenic: Luca Casonato If you can make time, please take a look at the proposed MDN naming/title changes in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AqiTcnQa74Dq-pAJKq1LLo3iple2MN1NoWAAGQlorIA/edit?usp=sharing and then please consider commenting at https://github.com/mdn/mdn-community/discussions/248 to either express support or else alternative suggestions
14:06	<Ms2ger 💉💉💉>	Domenic: hey, any chance you could take a look at https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/5339 soonish?
23:09	<Domenic>	Ms2ger 💉💉💉: I'll put it on the queue, but to be honest with no real implementer progress it's pretty low on the priority list.
23:09	<Domenic>	(outside the JS engines)