07:54 | <hsivonen> | FYI regarding earlier discussion: https://github.com/orgs/mdn/discussions/242#discussioncomment-4274011 (TL;DR: MDN continuing to use Prettier without forking it.) |
08:07 | <annevk> |
o_O |
09:25 | <sideshowbarker> | https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74638920/iframe-issue-javascript-alert-dialog-block-from-parent-when-added-permissions-p |
09:29 | <sideshowbarker> | https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74630989/why-use-domstringlist-rather-than-an-array is probably worth an answer from somebody familiar with I don’t know enough to answer well there. I guess |
11:28 | <Domenic> | Answered. That was a fun one. |
11:34 | <sideshowbarker> | Answered. That was a fun one. |
11:41 | <sideshowbarker> | By the way, https://w3c.github.io/stackoverflow/ is a dashboard thing I put together recently — for daily review of Stack Overflow Q&As for web-platform features (in part as a way to help get a better understanding of which web-platform features developers are actually using, and what their common pain points are) It is just a set of links to some tag-based searches. If you mouse over the names of the feature sets like Core and Graphics+typography, it’ll show you which tags it’s searching on. Or else if you just follow the links, the search-results pages all also show which tags the results are for. |
11:43 | <Domenic> | Oh, fun! |
16:41 | <dlrobertson> | annevk: re https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1520#discussion_r1037244005 do you have an example of a case where a internal model is specified? |
20:32 | <TabAtkins> | annevk: I'm trying to figure out how to say "if a URL's fragment is an ID reference" (rather than a Media Fragment, or one of those SVG fragment functions, or the like). Any opinions on how to phrase this? |
20:32 | <TabAtkins> | (I just need to carve out those other cases as Explicitly Undefined right now.) |
20:35 | <TabAtkins> | possibly the answer is to just not do that, and instead just unreservedly attempt to find an element with the given ID, and if it fails, handle the failure generically. |
20:36 | <TabAtkins> | (context: i'm cleaning up the spec text for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3320) |
21:01 | <annevk> | TabAtkins: perhaps HTML's fragment navigation thingie needs an abstraction, but that's where I'd look |
21:02 | <TabAtkins> | I'm end-running around the thing, since I need to handle "can't find the ID" the same way as "isn't an ID ref at all" anyway |
21:02 | <annevk> | https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-indicated-part-of-the-document |
21:02 | <annevk> | dlrobertson: Headers/Response/Request all do it pretty well I think |
21:03 | <dlrobertson> | 👍️ thanks I'll take a look |
21:03 | <annevk> | (really most WHATWG documents are good at separating private from public API) |
21:07 | <TabAtkins> | annevk: Hm, the "find a potential indicated element" is what I'm reproducing manually right now, so it would be nice to use it, but the algo specifies its "root" argument as a Document, not Document or ShadowRoot |
21:08 | <TabAtkins> | Well, I'm not doing the a-name resolution, but I could take or leave that |
21:14 | <annevk> | It should be possible to generalize to allow for another caller (while at the same time maybe constraining the name attribute stuff) |
21:14 | <annevk> | Gotta go for the day |
21:14 | <TabAtkins> | kk, i'll raise an issue. thanks for the help! |