| 05:37 | <sideshowbarker> | TabAtkins: just FYI as a follow-up about mdn-spec-links: I unbroke the auto update workflow, so going forward it’ll be generating PRs as expected again (e.g., https://github.com/w3c/mdn-spec-links/pull/712/files) — and if/when the workflow does break again, I”ll make an effort to get it fixed quickly, so it doesn’t end leaving the data weeks/months out of date (as it had ended up being) |
| 06:00 | <TabAtkins> | Awesome! |
| 22:35 | <sideshowbarker> | TabAtkins: Do you know if the definition of CSSImportRule recently moved out from the https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-cascade-5 to somewhere else? |
| 22:36 | <sideshowbarker> | nevermind, I see it’s in the CSSOM spec where it seems it should be |
| 22:38 | <sideshowbarker> | but in MDN for some reason we had a spec link for the CSSImportRule layerName property going to CSS Cascade spec at https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-cascade-5/#dom-cssimportrule-layername — but that fragment ID doesn’t even exist in the CSS Cascade spec |
| 22:39 | <sideshowbarker> | anyway, I’ll fix it |