WHATWG on 2023-04-26

01:57	<Domenic>	Since Resource-Hints has been archived and now points to HTML, it's not clear to me if dynamically inserted `<link rel="prefetch">` are supposed to work or if only the ones in the initial parsing would? It used to be explicitly stated The resource hint link's [...] MAY be dynamically added to and removed from the document. It was even one of the use-cases in that document. Did I just miss where the current specs would allow that? I was hoping for allowed in body to say something related but even looking at that I didn't find anything conclusive. I think prefetch is missing "appropriate times to fetch and process". Maybe file a bug? Noam Rosenthal will probably fix it quickly :)
01:58	<Kaiido>	Ok. Will do later today.
01:59	<Domenic>	Still lots of open issues for https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22topic%3A+link%22 sadly
02:00	<Domenic>	Although several of the older ones are mostly-fixed but have comments at the bottom saying "here's what remains to be fully 100% sure we've figured out this entire area"
04:30	<Noam Rosenthal>	I think prefetch is missing "appropriate times to fetch and process". Maybe file a bug? Noam Rosenthal will probably fix it quickly :) Oh darn, I have a clear memory of me writing that bit but it must have been deja-vu from other link types. CC me on the filed bug Kaiido !
09:25	<annevk>	zcorpan: ping on https://github.com/html5lib/html5lib-tests/pull/163
23:37	<zcorpan>	ack
23:38	<zcorpan>	https://twitter.com/mutherpluckinb/status/1538852415331500038 is a good point. Is it possible to pass on a user activation with postMessage?
23:38	<Jeffrey Yasskin>	We had a proposal for that... <looks for it>
23:41	<Jeffrey Yasskin>	https://twitter.com/mutherpluckinb/status/1538852415331500038 is a good point. Is it possible to pass on a user activation with postMessage? https://chromestatus.com/feature/5574000088449024
23:42	<zcorpan>	Jeffrey Yasskin: thx
23:44	<Jeffrey Yasskin>	Oh, but it's still alive and shipped in Chrome as https://wicg.github.io/capability-delegation/spec.html
23:46	<Jeffrey Yasskin>	The difference is that each capability has to be specified separately, as opposed to delegating activation itself.
23:48	<zcorpan>	Jeffrey Yasskin: right, the feature url is https://chromestatus.com/feature/5708770829139968