| 08:56 | <annevk> | Ms2ger: thanks for writing many <script type language> tests at some point; small contribution: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/40112 |
| 09:36 | <Burt Paulie> | TabAtkins: I thank you for answering within the scope of your immediate understanding. I am certain your knowledge outstrips mine regarding the processes underlying the implementation of HTML in every' context. However, neither of your suggestions (stated in the links you posted) meet my needs... |
| 10:00 | <Burt Paulie> | To keep this simple (because I am leaving this forum out of my scope), if I told you that I'd like to see the binaries for the service of a Unicode character, I feel like I'd be told (once again) that I'm at the "wrong level of abstraction" or that perhaps I "should read this specification (to be found languishing within the world of Zelda's liberator no less)". I might be mistaken in this... |
| 10:05 | <Burt Paulie> | I am finding, however, that the overall impression I receive is that it is you refuse to confess to your own industries failure to meet a global standard of human nature in favor of the traditional practices of a single language family... |
| 10:08 | <Burt Paulie> | I can tell you, I have not yet looked into documentation for returning binary data for the storage of a Unicode character. I'm busy, like most people, and certainly not "brimming with knowledge" as are many administrators like yourself who choose to spend time answering student questions and posting links relevant to the documentation they help maintain... |
| 10:13 | <Burt Paulie> | But like anyone of adequate intelligence, I know it exists. I know whatever thread(s) define it can be specified, compiled, and analyzed until the exact sequences responsible for the appearance of the character on the screen are itemizable as a matter of Post Tables within the discipline of Algebraic Logic... |
| 10:14 | <canadahonk> | there is no standard (binary) representation for (parsed) HTML, every engine is different. to be clear, HTML is not compiled into binary and ran, it is just parsed and that parsed interpretation is used within browser engines for their own needs. |
| 10:18 | <Burt Paulie> | So if I come to your forum and inquire of the standards you maintain only to be told there is no manner, no way, no process to return the valid binaries that are explicitly responsible for the service and display of HTML, CSS, Unicode, or any other screen element, I'd care to say that you are full of shit... |
| 10:19 | <Burt Paulie> | One f!@#ing Unicode character sure as hell has a binary, just like any other "tag". You're it!!... |
| 10:21 | <Burt Paulie> | According to me, the only "job" you people are doing here is posting hate mail. HaTeMaiL and CuSSes... |
| 11:16 | <annevk> | Oh, I was about to give them a final warning with a pointer to https://whatwg.org/code-of-conduct but this works too I guess. |
| 17:26 | <Ehsan Azari> | I come from another industries, so we have standards, and based on those standards we normally generate OWL, RDF, and recently JSON-LD and UML schemas So, if I want to have HTML elements tags and their related attributes in JSON or JSON-LD, is there any ready to use schema? Should have a look at schema.org or somewhare? |
| 21:31 | <MO _ Satar> | good evening guys |
| 21:32 | <MO _ Satar> | 😄 |