| 19:47 | <sirisian> | Is there a CSSWG type channel on Matrix? Someone here might know in any case. Has there ever been a discussion for allowing "display: contents" to appear invisible to CSS descendant combinators? I know that kind of goes against hierarchical way CSS works. I was thinking either a style on the element like display-contents: ignore. Or an optional descendant like .foo > :display-contents > .bar that descends through any number of display: contents. Does the fact that display is computed make this impossible/difficult? |
| 22:50 | <TabAtkins> | sirisian: No, CSSWG still works on IRC (the W3C irc server, #css room). |
| 22:51 | <Misty Peters> | Where |
| 22:51 | <TabAtkins> | But directly for your question, no, it's impossible to have a selector depend on properties. |
| 22:54 | <sirisian> | Thanks |
| 23:15 | <aja> | https://matrix.to/#/#w3c_css:matrix.org |