| 06:16 | <annevk> | vrafaeli: the complexity it brings; e.g., something that's both a table row and a hyperlink is not something AT understands, from a security perspective <tr> was safe and now it's maybe not. The use case has to be extremely compelling and I don't think it's that compelling given that there's often other designs possible or workarounds that get you most of the way there. |
| 06:53 | <vrafaeli> | I don't really get it. Of course AT does not understand something that is not a defined concept yet. But if allowed I don't see any reason AT should not understand it. Also I do not understand the security perspective, what exactly is the problem? |
| 07:31 | <annevk> | vrafaeli: I'm just saying it does not come for free and as such it's a trade off against other things we can be working on. |