| 09:39 | <freddy> | I clicked on "Approve and Run" for the HTTPS Upgrades Pull Request at least 3 times this week. At which point can I add this to my CV? |
| 09:39 | <freddy> | (Happy about the progress btw! Really excited for this coming together) |
| 09:58 | <Domenic> | annevk: keithamus: starting from https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9851#issuecomment-1765614088 ... I can live with parenthesis, but the following options all seem a bit nicer to me:
|
| 10:05 | <keithamus> | The css-right-align option seems useful for improving aesthetics without compromising on AT readability. I also am happy with the separate conforming column assuming that we're only aiming to add this column to tables which have some non-conforming attributes (i.e. we don't have an empty column on half the tables). |
| 10:05 | <Domenic> | Yep, that was my idea |
| 10:07 | <keithamus> | Should there be an additional note on those tables explaining what conforming means? Or perhaps there is a concept the heading can link to? |
| 10:08 | <Domenic> | Throughout the spec we seem to use "conforming" without any links, but we could link to https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#conformance-requirements-for-authors I guess |
| 10:08 | <annevk> | The only option I don't like is "My split table", the other 4 (including parenthesis in this number) seem good. |
| 10:09 | <annevk> | And thanks for raising it in the meeting keithamus. |
| 10:11 | <Domenic> | CSS right-align looked weird |
| 10:12 | <keithamus> | Extra column it is! |
| 10:12 | <Domenic> | Also... I think the rows are broken? The description rows don't line up with the keywords |
| 10:12 | <Domenic> | I guess default is missing a description row |
| 10:14 | <Domenic> | Summarized at https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9851#issuecomment-1814150780 |
| 10:40 | <zcorpan> | https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9932#discussion_r1394563367 - do we have a general policy against changing dfn ids? |
| 11:05 | <smaug> | Noam Rosenthal: (I'm kind of on vacation) Saw the meeting minutes. Yes, I know there is a microtask bug in Gecko. I should fix it |
| 11:06 | <smaug> | What was the context for that discussion ? |
| 11:06 | <smaug> | (fix is to remove one line) |
| 11:08 | <Noam Rosenthal> | smaug: oh interesting. can you share the bug URL when you're not kind of on vacation? :) I raised it because it came to me from a web developer and I wasn't sure if it's a spec bug or a Gecko bug. |
| 11:10 | <smaug> | I think it is basically a leftover from pre-webidl times. Microtasks were implemented just before new bindings in Gecko, IIRC (2012 or so). |
| 11:12 | <smaug> | Noam Rosenthal: but do you have a testcase, so that I can be sure it is about the same issue |
| 11:13 | <Noam Rosenthal> | smaug: they're working on a minimal reproducible case, will pass it along |
| 11:14 | <smaug> | sounds great, thanks |
| 11:18 | <annevk> | Enjoy your vacation smaug! |
| 12:28 | <canadahonk> | Curious, where are meeting minutes now? (I looked in whatwg/sg but nothing from 2023?) |
| 13:51 | <Noam Rosenthal> | There's a Google Doc with the minutes, not sure who's admin to share it etc. Panos Astithas ? |
| 13:59 | <zcorpan> | Shouldn't it be public? Looks like it's not, but not sure if it's intentional |
| 14:01 | <Noam Rosenthal> | I think so too, not sure either and didn't want to assume |
| 14:02 | <annevk> | The minutes are copied into the issues, which are still managed by whatwg/html. The document is mainly for those attending the meeting. |