03:12 | <Domenic> | annevk: any chance we can snipe you into implementing and updating tests for https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1079 ? |
07:27 | <chargeitall> | why the whatwg webpages do not have a sidebar index like the w3c or workgroups do? |
08:18 | <annevk> | Domenic: I think we might have tried to roll something like that out and got bitten by a router so I'd prefer a more coordinated rollout. If there's someone on the Chromium side who is willing it might be something we can try next year though. |
08:19 | <annevk> | See whatwg/whatwg.org for an issue on this. |
08:19 | <Domenic> | I think that particular one was designed to only be backward-compatible? But who knows; it's fair to want something more coordinated. |
08:24 | <annevk> | It's prolly also very hot code making it more tricky to navigate, but it's worth looking into as the status quo sucks. |
08:42 | <chargeitall> | the link is invalid https://whatwg/whatwg.org |
08:59 | <chargeitall> | another pretty handy extension. I did not understand your proposal. |
09:12 | <chargeitall> | I could not find an issue on git. |
09:48 | <annevk> | I thought https://github.com/whatwg/whatwg.org/issues had an issue for this, but it seems not |
09:54 | <chargeitall> | I am intrigued as to why it was not brought up. |
10:41 | <annevk> | It has been brought up, but maybe just on Chat. |
13:51 | <Ms2ger> | Where does it say that you can't set EventTarget.prototype.__proto__ ? I don't think https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#platform-object-setprototypeof applies |
13:51 | <Ms2ger> | cc annevk |
13:54 | <chargeitall> | can I create an issue or you would rather do it yourself. |
14:18 | <Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders]> | AFAICT, per WebIDL, it has the normal [[SetPrototypeOf]] ? |
14:20 | <Ms2ger> | That would be fine by me if that's what browsers did :) |
14:20 | <Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders]> | I am making no judgement about what browsers do 🙃 |
14:21 | <Andreu Botella> | I once, when working on something for Deno, saw a WPT test that checked that |
14:21 | <Andreu Botella> | let me find it |
14:21 | <Ms2ger> | Oh, I believe it's tested |
14:21 | <Ms2ger> | I'm just not sure about the spec part |
14:22 | <Ms2ger> | https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/webidl/ecmascript-binding/global-immutable-prototype.any.js |
14:22 | <Ms2ger> | (I would know, I wrote it) |
14:23 | <Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders]> | yeah I was about to say, "didn't you write those tests" |
14:23 | <Andreu Botella> | I'm pretty sure I found some spec text for it |
14:23 | <Andreu Botella> | but I don't remember where |
14:24 | <Ms2ger> | Ah, https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#interface-prototype-object step 8 |
14:24 | <Ms2ger> | Thanking my 2016 self for having the foresight to link to the spec changes 😅 |
14:25 | <Ms2ger> | And thanks Andreu Botella for making me look for them :) |
14:26 | <Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders]> | i.e., there exists some interface with [Global] that inherits from EventTarget ? |
14:26 | <Andreu Botella> | Window does |
14:26 | <Ms2ger> | All of them do |
14:26 | <Andreu Botella> | and WorkerGlobalScope |
14:50 | <Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders]> | oh, right. duh. because they're event targets. |
21:00 | <keithamus> | For spam, please don’t close any issues but instead forward them to me. I’ve enabled a flag on the repo which gives GH staff access to fast flag spammy accounts but only if the issue/pr remains open. Of course if you’d rather continue closing and labelling as spam please continue to do so, but if you are comfortable linking or otherwise leaving spammy issues to me then I’ll be able to tag them properly in our systems. |
21:26 | <TabAtkins> | The issue is https://github.com/whatwg/meta/issues/222 |