09:33 | <Ms2ger (back in 2024 W2)> | It involves Ms2ger (back in 2024 W2) |
12:03 | <chargeitall> | I'm quoting from this source: https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#implementation-defined "Features that are defined in documents using the Infra Standard that can be used as a tracking vector are marked as this paragraph is". This sentence is unclear to me: "are marked as this paragraph is". Can you explain what it means? |
12:21 | <annevk> | chargeitall: it's referencing the fingerprint icon, maybe we should make that more explicit |
12:26 | <chargeitall> | I appreciate your clarification. I was puzzled by the presence of this fingerprint. I did not see how it related to this phrase since the fingerprint icon was far from the text. |
16:19 | <ljharb> | using only icons and not also text isn't accessible anyways, that should probably be improved |
16:38 | <chargeitall> | https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#algorithm-declaration Q1. Is it better to add parameter type? e.g. "Declare algorithms by stating their name, parameter type, parameters, and return type, in the following form:" |
16:40 | <annevk> | There's no alt attribute? |
16:41 | <ljharb> | i'm sure there is but i shouldnt have to hover to see what something means, ideally |
16:43 | <chargeitall> | The word "fingerprint" was missing in the paragraph as opposed to
|
16:49 | <Ms2ger (back in 2024 W2)> | Variables are conventionally rendered in italic |
16:54 | <chargeitall> | your clarification qualifies to a concept used by multiple standards without a good home. would it make sense to add it to the infra standard? |