| 04:28 | <Thad Guidry> | Hello, I'm using ReSpec and trying to reference the 2 concepts that I thought would already be part of Webref (xref) indexing and/or even Infra. I know from RFC2119 that these have been around forever. But I was honestly surprised that even with those terms used in Infra docs itself and 1000's of other standards, that those 2 concepts are not indexed? The reason I would have thought they would already be part Webref was that they come into play when describing parameters or arguments that are either REQUIRED or OPTIONAL. How can I help make the concepts of RFC2119 (and the concepts aliases) as part of Webref or Infra , so that in ReSpec I could simply refer to them via the Shorthand syntax of |
| 05:28 | <sideshowbarker> | Thad Guidry: Seems like you can do that already by using the English prose words must and should — rather than needing to type an [=OPTIONAL=] and [=REQUIRED=] macro thing |
| 06:23 | <By Sineks> | hi |
| 06:23 | <By Sineks> | css3 için "backroung-opacity" özelliği gelecekmi? |
| 06:24 | <By Sineks> | Will the "backroung-opacity" feature come to css3? |
| 20:52 | <Andreu Botella> | I'm looking at custom element reactions. Is my understanding correct that every time that JS code could trigger a CE reaction, it is through a [CEReactions] WebIDL method? And the only times where the reactions are run in a microtask are when they're caused by user interaction with no JS code in sight? |