| 00:29 | <Domenic> | Why did we use labels and not milestones for Stages? |
| 00:33 | <zcorpan> | Domenic: ok, thanks. Yeah thinking about this again, milestones isn't a good match for Stages... Changing milestone for a single issue as it progresses isn't how you normally use milestones |
| 07:56 | <Andreu Botella> | Hey, it's 5 minutes before the WHATNOT meeting, right? I don't have a link to the call |
| 08:00 | <sideshowbarker> | Andreu Botella: https://meet.google.com/hfm-ttah-hfh |
| 08:01 | <sideshowbarker> | I think, at least — I am there now, but nobody else is… Anyway, that’s the link I had in my calendar at least |
| 08:02 | <sideshowbarker> | Who usually chairs the WHATNOT meetings in this time slot? |
| 08:02 | <Domenic> | Either me or Chris Wilson... I'm a bit late but I thought Chris RSVPed |
| 08:03 | <Domenic> | Be there in 2 |
| 08:06 | <Andreu Botella> | I'm in the "asking to be let in" screen, btw |
| 11:33 | <annevk> | Noam Rosenthal: do you remember what https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-request-replaces-client-id is? I don't really follow the note below. Because target browsing context is a field on an environment, so if that environment's target browsing context has an active document which is associated with an environment, isn't the same environment as you got the target browsing context from? |
| 11:35 | <annevk> | Also unclear if that's still correct in a world with navigables I suppose. |
| 11:38 | <Noam Rosenthal> | annevk: IIRC it’s for service workers, to let you keep track of a same origin nav. Afk but will double check in a bit |
| 11:39 | <annevk> | Noam Rosenthal: yeah that rings a bell. I have doubts this setup works as intended. It seems like we don't have to look at this for our new cookie work fortunately. |
| 12:41 | <Noam Rosenthal> | annevk: yea it's read at: https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#dom-fetchevent-replacesclientid |
| 12:42 | <Noam Rosenthal> | ... and set https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/browsing-the-web.html#create-navigation-params-by-fetching The note can probably be updated to use the newer terms |
| 12:44 | <Noam Rosenthal> | ... not sure what it means in terms of the new cookie work, I'm not familiar with it |
| 13:52 | <annevk> | Luke Warlow: for your node conversion PR, is it okay if I push to it, or would you prefer to continue with getting reviews? |
| 13:52 | <Luke Warlow> | That's absolutely fine |
| 13:52 | <Luke Warlow> | It's "done" as far as I'm concerned so if there's fix ups where I've misunderstood or done something wrong go ahead :) |
| 14:07 | <annevk> | Luke Warlow: when you have a moment please review my changes and leave a comment in the PR |
| 14:13 | <annevk> | Oh hmm, some more Oxford commas to add I just realized |
| 19:20 | <sefeng> | Noam Rosenthal: I think this is an editorial thing - It looks like the "items" for fetch param got batched into two separate groups https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#infrastructure and things like To reporting timing... got injected in between? |
| 19:20 | <sefeng> | oh sorry nvm, I misread |