07:54
<annevk>
Yeah, the commits are definitely more curated than the PRs (and we try to make the log fairly scannable as well), though the PRs have a lot more information if you need additional context.
08:00
<sideshowbarker>
Video link for the triage meeting?
08:04
<krosylight>
Video link for the triage meeting?
Just heard from smaug that it's just a remnant of an old meeting, no actual meeting now
08:04
<sideshowbarker>
Aha, thanks
08:05
<smaug>
there is another meeting way later today (or rather, early tomorrow)
08:22
<annevk>
Yeah, the meeting is in 15h - 22min
08:23
<annevk>
(I'll be sleeping through it per usual.)
14:22
<hsivonen>
annevk: Have you noticed https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-emailcore-as-09.html#name-use-and-validation-in-html- and https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-emailcore-as-09.html#name-use-of-addresses-in-top-lev ?
14:34
<annevk>
That's news to me. I'm surprised how it's just a simple description of what HTML does given that J.C. Klensin doesn't appear to like the HTML rules.
19:00
<Jake Archibald>
annevk: do you know off the top of your head how sandboxed data-url workers are? Are they entirely originless?
19:01
<Jake Archibald>
Trying to figure out if it's a safe place to run 3p code. Or if there's a benefit of putting a worker in a sandboxed iframe instead
23:44
<smaug>
jarhar: by any chance, have you checked how often select (size=1) has been used in iframes which are too small to show the whole popup - meaning that in current desktop browsers the popup covers also some of the parent document?
23:45
<smaug>
(I did find some instances of such cases when we were considering to use content processes for select popup rendering)
23:58
<smaug>
(the new select would be of course opt-in)