05:40
<annevk>
If anyone has particular topics to discuss at TPAC, we're holding another WHATUP: https://github.com/whatwg/meta/issues/326
06:58
<annevk>
Domenic: further thoughts on https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10564?
07:06
<Domenic>
I think our existing "(the empty string)" convention is good. I would prefer you correct the single capitalized variant you found. I think we could contemplate adding quotes to all keywords (not just in the tables, but elsewhere too) but I think that opens up a lot of questions, e.g. do we do the same for attribute names or element local names?
07:07
<Domenic>
I'm unclear why we're revisiting this months after Keith's original PRs settled everything on a single style.
07:16
<annevk>
I guess I'll do that for now, but I had missed at the time we included parenthesis here. I think that's a rather confusing notation.
07:19
<annevk>
(And I do think it might make sense to distinguish a node's local name from a reference to the node itself.)
15:19
<Jake Archibald>
Anyone know where the click behaviour on <button disabled> is specified?
15:22
<Jake Archibald>

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/form-control-infrastructure.html#enabling-and-disabling-form-controls:-the-disabled-attribute

A form control that is disabled must prevent any click events that are queued on the user interaction task source from being dispatched on the element.

But that doesn't seem to cover how it prevents propagation of click events dispatched on child elements

15:25
<annevk>
Jake Archibald: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/1567 is related and generally search for "activation behavior" in whatwg/html; unfortunately that's messy and nobody has taken the time to clean it up as-of-yet
15:26
<Jake Archibald>
Good to know I'm not missing something obvious. Thanks!