06:23
<annevk>
Congrats on getting customizable <select> landed jarhar (and Domenic)!
06:29
<annevk>
Are we getting a blog post?
06:49
<Domenic>
I think we should, if Joey's up for it!
06:49
<Domenic>
annevk Dominic Farolino: ping for review on https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11442
07:04
<annevk>
I just cloned whatwg/streams and downloaded close to 2 GiB⁉️
07:10
<sideshowbarker>
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/tree/main/reference-implementation
07:10
<sideshowbarker>
web-platform-tests submodule in there
07:11
<annevk>
Oh sigh. I committed a cardinal sin. (I did not remove the PR number from the commit title.)
07:11
<annevk>
Yeah, that must be it. WPT is huge.
07:12
<sideshowbarker>
welcome to the club, sinner
07:12
<annevk>
Also, what is going on with GitHub. I keep having to approve the workflow of a branch I'm actively pushing to.
11:17
<Luke Warlow>
It'd be great if we could get https://github.com/html5lib/html5lib-tests/pull/178 updated and merged too. Else parsers might run into issues or update and not quite match the spec (if they base it on the tests)
11:45
<annevk>
Agreed. That doesn't appear to be in a great state according to the comments. jarhar ^^
14:53
<evilpie>
Did we ever consider not allowing javascript: URLs for navigation.navigate or would that be problematic by making the API less powerful than location.href ?
15:02
<Domenic>
Someone raised it on the Chromium issue tracker once. They weren't able to explain what it solves, when location.href exists...
15:08
<evilpie>
I get the point. It does feel a bit unfortunate to me that we are introducing a new script sink.
15:09
<evilpie>
I of course don't actually believe that you can create a reasonable secure website by somehow protecting all scripts sink manually or something like that!
16:09
<Luca Casonato>
is there an active CSS matrix room?
16:10
<emilio>
#layout:mozilla.org
17:53
<TabAtkins>
(The CSSWG still uses IRC, fwiw. irc.w3.org#css )