| 08:24 | <Doctor> | Are there any pending changes/proposals to do with the way streams work? |
| 08:30 | <evilpie> | I don't think this is what you mean, but https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1283 added transformer.cancel, which hasn't been shipped in any major browser. |
| 08:33 | <Doctor> | Not what I was hoping for |
| 08:39 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Being more specific would help people answer your question better. there are probably all kinds of stream-related proposals/issues on github that you could search or propose new ones |
| 08:39 | <Doctor> | Is there a structure guide somewhere on proposing new ones? |
| 08:40 | <Doctor> | What I'd like to change is to allow transform streams to be byob |
| 08:45 | <Noam Rosenthal> | https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues "New Issue" has a few templates |
| 08:46 | <Noam Rosenthal> | ... and you can search the existing list in that URL |
| 14:26 | <Aron het Lam> | Hi, I am told to ping Domenic about this in the Ladybird chat, so I hope that’s ok. Does this in the WebIDL spec essentially mean that extended attributes are allowed on both sides of the required keyword for dictionary members?To me it seems the linked spec below can be expanded to ExtendedAttributeList required TypeWithExtendedAttributes identifier ;https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#prod-DictionaryMember |
| 15:05 | <annevk> | Aron het Lam: that seems correct, but I suspect it also means you could have [X] [X] Type ident; in theory, which is also a bit weird. Hmm no it doesn't as that wouldn't match the production. I suspect this came to be as part of making extended attributes associable with types, but that left a couple of weird corner cases. |
| 17:47 | <Cesar Sanchez> | Hi |
| 19:45 | <Doctor> | In a byob readable, you may be given a buffer that that has an offset greater than zero and a length less than the remainder of the buffer. Aka a subsection of the underlying buffer. When transferring this buffer and/or responding with a new buffer, should one make sure the contents before and after your section of the buffer aren't mutated/missing? |
| 19:46 | <Doctor> | For example, if I .respondWithNewView, should I guarantee that any content that was before my offset in the buffer given matches that with the buffer I'm now passing back? |