| 02:50 | <Doctor> | I did a bit of testing myself and the answer seems to be yes. One shouldn't make sure that they mess with or lose the data outside of their subjection of their buffer. |
| 06:16 | <annevk> | Domenic: is it intentional that error dispatches more often than load here: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#execute-the-script-element |
| 08:07 | <Luke Warlow> | annevk: I don't suppose you're about for whatnot |
| 09:07 | <annevk> | Sorry for being late. I'm really bad at early meetings because they so rarely happen I'm usually fully absorbed by some other engineering task. |
| 09:09 | <annevk> | We also need to figure out the chairing situation as initially these meetings were pitched with the idea of not putting additional burden on editors and while it's not that much work, I do feel it (and occasionally forget). Panos Astithas cwilso any ideas? |
| 09:12 | <Noam Rosenthal> | If we had a rotation for chairing I'm happy to take part |
| 09:23 | <annevk> | Sounds good. Apart from managing the discussion, the main thing is organizing the minutes, making sure the minutes are posted to this week's issue, and opening the issue for the following week. |
| 09:36 | <annevk> | zcorpan: keithamus: for https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11413 should we also change the hn selectors in the UA style sheet to use :heading(n)? |
| 09:37 | <annevk> | Oh wait, we already discussed that it seems back in June. Okay. I'll approve. But let's not forget that change when adding the attributes as it's important. |
| 09:37 | <zcorpan> | It's equivalent now but would make a difference with headingstart or what it's called |
| 09:38 | <keithamus> | I think so, especially if we ship headingoffset |
| 09:39 | <annevk> | Maybe after this lands, keithamus can rebase the attribute PR(s?) to include that. |
| 09:41 | <annevk> | For those that are interested in the MoU we have with the W3C: https://github.com/w3c/whatwg-coord/issues/22 |
| 10:05 | <Noam Rosenthal> | opened this for patching: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11542 |
| 10:09 | <Noam Rosenthal> | ... the other one has been open for 9 years (https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2142) so I posted on it some of the discussion from today :) |
| 10:15 | <Noam Rosenthal> | annevk: given the WHATNOT discussion perhaps https://github.com/WICG/sanitizer-api/issues/190 needs to be reopened? |
| 10:28 | <annevk> | Noam Rosenthal: that seems reasonable. Though it's very much out-of-scope for the work currently ongoing it does seem good to keep it in mind. |
| 10:47 | <Luke Warlow> | ... the other one has been open for 9 years (https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2142) so I posted on it some of the discussion from today :) |
| 10:48 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Yea absolutely, didn't get to it yet. Thanks! |
| 11:16 | <Noam Rosenthal> | https://github.com/w3c/trusted-types/issues/594 |