| 08:25 | <zcorpan> | Noam Rosenthal: I think the syntax for dictionary members is wrong |
| 08:26 | <zcorpan> | type identifier = "value"; |
| 08:26 | <Noam Rosenthal> | oops of course. context switching between TypeScript and WebIDL too much |
| 09:09 | <annevk> | mfreed: the interactivity property HTML PR appears to be a permanent GitHub unicorn for me: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10956 |
| 09:43 | <Luke Warlow> | Noam Rosenthal: I think the syntax for dictionary members is wrong Yeah the syntax isn't webidl in a few places. Missing semi colons, and incorrect types. I assumed it was meant to be Typescript but if it could be WebIDL that would be nice. It gets the point across though |
| 09:44 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Thanks, I'll get it fixed. It was meant to be more illustrative for the purpose of a discussion rather than a ready spec PR :) but if it helps readability I'll do another syntax pass |
| 11:21 | <Noam Rosenthal> | I think it's more readable/valid now. |
| 12:05 | <zcorpan> | Hmm I can't close issues in https://github.com/w3c/DOM-Parsing |
| 12:06 | <Luke Warlow> | I think I can if there's a specific one you want closed |
| 12:07 | <zcorpan> | https://github.com/w3c/DOM-Parsing/issues/76 |
| 14:11 | smaug | mumbles again the animation in various specs when clicking a term. Hurts his eyes. |
| 14:15 | <annevk> | Do you mean the animation when the box moves to the bottom? That it moves slightly to the side of the screen? I hadn't noticed that before. I suspect that's a style sheet that Bikeshed injects. We used to be in full control over all WHATWG styles, but new styles kept getting injected and we didn't stay on top of it. We'll take patches to fix that for sure. |
| 14:15 | <smaug> | yeah, that one |
| 14:16 | <smaug> | (looking at Sanitizer API this time) |
| 14:22 | <smaug> | I guess it is https://github.com/speced/bikeshed/issues/2772 |
| 19:05 | <foolip> | I'm trying to remember a global API that had to be renamed due to web compat, similar to Array.prototype.includes but for window.something. In my memory it's fetch() that was originally planned as get(), but I can't find any evidence of it. |
| 19:05 | <foolip> | annevk ^ |
| 19:39 | <Noam Rosenthal> | report |
| 19:40 | <Noam Rosenthal> | (... in addition to the fetch thing you are looking for which I don't recall/know about) |
| 21:42 | <smaug> | Noam Rosenthal: I don't still understand how the route -thingie would work with cross-origin history navigations |
| 21:43 | <smaug> | When doing non-history navigation, I assume the name maps to some URLPattern which can be cross-origin, since the url is known from the page, but session history is different case. |
| 21:52 | <jmdyck> | Domenic: The speculative loading commit introduced an undefined var: in prepare the script element, step 34.2.speculationrules.1 refers to document which is not defined. |
| 21:53 | <jmdyck> | Also, register/unregister speculation rules step 3 refers to undefined document |