| 04:57 | <eemeli> | Regarding the conversation following https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11933#issuecomment-3576322026, is there an expectation on me as the PR author to file new PRs for the Fetch and CSP specifications to add "text" (or something like it) as a known fetch destination, along with its associated CSP directive? And is this something that ought to happen before or after the HTML spec PR gets merged? |
| 08:08 | <annevk> | eemeli: it's not necessarily on you, but you doing it might be most expedient. And usually we try to merge them all around the same time as they form a cohesive whole. |
| 08:12 | <eemeli> | That makes sense. Next (related) question: What's the appropriate place to discuss what the fetch destination and CSP directive ought to be, as I presume that ought to take into account the type: 'bytes' proposal as well, given how similar they are? |
| 08:15 | <annevk> | eemeli: Fetch for the destinations, CSP for the directives. I suspect CSP will want to group them with "json". For Fetch it'll have to be unique from "json" and in principle they could share a name I suppose, but it's probably easier and more flexible if we added "text" and "bytes" and call it a day. |
| 08:18 | <annevk> | And any tests you write can be shared across those PRs. I think for Fetch we mainly want to test that Sec-Fetch-Dest has the correct value. And for CSP that you can prevent the requests from going out. |
| 08:19 | <eemeli> | Great, one more meta question: Is there a preference for smaller or larger issues around this space? The original HTML spec issue covered text, bytes, and URL. Should the issues I file for Fetch & CSP cover both text & bytes, or just text? |
| 08:20 | <annevk> | eemeli: either is fine; important thing is that the PRs will have to be aligned with the HTML PR. Can't land "text" and "bytes" on one end and not the other. |
| 08:23 | <eemeli> | Got it, so at least the PRs I file ought to be specifically about text, and it's on Styfle (or someone else) to take bytes forwards. |
| 09:09 | <Doctor> | Has there been any movement to supporting byob with pipeThrough on readable streams? |
| 14:46 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | Is there a calendar I can subscribe to for all WHATNOT meetings, rather than ask for an invite on a one-by-one basis? |
| 14:59 | <annevk> | nicolo-ribaudo: can you DM me your preferred email? |