| 00:37 | <Kaiido> | I believe the original distinction was to make it clear to the users that dispatchEvent is synchronous, and they talked about "native events" as something referring to the most common case, like e.g., a pointer event fired from a device. The event is dispatched from a task, (magically) queued on the event loop. For authors that's an async process. So maybe something along the lines of"Unlike most native events which are fired from a dedicated task executed asynchronously, dispatchEvent invokes the event handlers synchronously and does not run microtasks between each callback." would keep it clear enough while being technically correct? |
| 09:31 | <Psychpsyo> | Hello, I've opened https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12294 two weeks ago to fix what I believe is a spec bug around document initialization. What's the process to get this sort of thing reviewed? |
| 11:23 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Looks like a reasonable bug fix to me, thanks! |
| 11:44 | <sideshowbarker> | Psychpsyo: Need to sign the Participant Agreement https://participate.whatwg.org/agreement-status?user=Psychpsyo&repo=html&pull=12294 |
| 12:28 | <Psychpsyo> | Done that now. |
| 12:31 | <Psychpsyo> | (begrudgingly) |
| 13:21 | <annevk> | Usama Nadeem: it looks interesting. I don't think it's what we typically consider "memory-safe", but requiring less memory is certainly a good design feature. |
| 13:26 | <annevk> | Thanks! Would you mind fixing my nit on the PR or would you prefer I do it before landing? |
| 13:27 | <annevk> | hsivonen: did you have a chance to review Unicode's latest response to https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/543? I was hoping you could evaluate that. |
| 14:11 | <Psychpsyo> | Done that now. |
| 14:32 | <Usama Nadeem> | So what to do next ?is it acceptable should I work on it? Also Im stuck on the pr review here I know it could take time but if anyone could just let me know how much time I should be expecting to be merged the PR! https://github.com/whatwg/fs/pull/182 |
| 14:36 | <annevk> | smaug: any thoughts on https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12017 (in particular my reply)? |
| 14:54 | <smaug> | It might be too late to fix 3580 |
| 15:09 | <bkardell> | https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/12320#issue-4153544407 Just out of curiosity annevk ... Like, how did this come up?. |
| 15:10 | <annevk> | bkardell: found it during code review. |
| 15:11 | <annevk> | smaug: okay, shall we close it then? I don't get the impression anyone is going to work on that anytime soon either. |
| 15:27 | <smaug> | let me close |
| 15:28 | <smaug> | we can always reopen if needed |
| 15:34 | <annevk> | I think you could work on it, but the editors not being responsive is not great. I've pinged Google about it, but haven't gotten a reply as-of-yet. Perhaps Noam Rosenthal or foolip can help out. |
| 16:47 | <Noam Rosenthal> | (... looking ...) |
| 16:53 | <Noam Rosenthal> | I've nudged Marijn on internal chat |