03:34
<jmdyck>

In https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#common-input-element-events, 3rd para, toward the end, it might be

the user agent must (1) queue a task ... and (2) fire an event ...

or

the user agent must queue a task ... to (1) set its validity.. and (2) fire an event...

03:36
<jmdyck>
I'm pretty sure it's the latter, but it seems like that could be clearer.
03:44
<jmdyck>

In prose, you could distinguish the two by inserting a "both", e.g.

the user agent must both queue a task and fire an event

or

the user agent must queue a task to both set its validity and fire an event

but it might be clearer to use an <ol> or <ul>.

03:45
<jmdyck>
Could the whole para be more list-ified?
04:15
<jmdyck>
It's one enormous sentence.
06:42
<annevk>
Yeah I think that would be a good change.
11:19
<emilio>
annevk: FWIW I just left a question in https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/57959#issuecomment-4223338679 (just saw the failure during triage). I'm not sure that expectation is justified? It doesn't match any other pseudo-element
12:12
<annevk>
emilio: yeah that does seem wrong. I can take a look later today but feel free to overwrite if you have something going already.
12:12
<annevk>
(Perhaps that test should be collapsed into the other pseudo-element tests.)
12:18
<emilio>
annevk: I think having the test separately is fine, either way tho... https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D293487 if you want to stamp :)
12:19
<emilio>
(cc keithamus ^)
12:20
<annevk>
emilio: hmm but what should happen when there's nothing in the style sheet?
12:22
<annevk>
Because now it's testing something slightly different as far as I can tell.
12:36
<emilio>
annevk: I mean, same thing? Style is resolved, just no rules applied, so default style inheriting from parent
12:37
<emilio>
annevk: but happy to test that as well i guess by adding another div
12:40
<annevk>
emilio: WebKit will pass with your change, pretty sure
12:41
<annevk>
So you'll be hiding the bug.
12:43
<annevk>
We pass existing ::file-selector-button tests around this for instance despite those using pretty much the same code path. Except the tests for that have an existing style rule.
12:46
<emilio>
annevk: ok, that's rather bizarre... Added a test for that
14:24
<annevk>
emilio: if you're curious: https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/62444
14:32
<emilio>
annevk: sweet!
20:01
<Usama Nadeem>
hello there someone could tell me do It take more time? Im asking about the PR! and if theres some issue please do let me know!