| 10:11 | <zcorpan> | Why does the PR preview fail for https://github.com/whatwg/fullscreen/pull/232 ? I don't get the build error when building locally (and I added "removing steps" to the link-defaults) |
| 13:21 | <Noam Rosenthal> | https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12395 also fails, but with some sort of internal error |
| 13:29 | <Noam Rosenthal> | oh it succeeds now, seems intermittent |
| 15:09 | <Smith> | Is your partner being unfaithful? 😔 Struggling to find proof? 🚨 We’ve got you covered! Get the evidence you need with expert cybersecurity tools. 🛠️ 🔐 Need to track suspicious activity? 🔍 Want to recover deleted messages or photos? ⚠️ Spot Red Flags: Learn how to identify signs of cheating before it’s too late. 🛡️ Worried about online privacy or hacking attempts? Join our Telegram channel for step-by-step guidance, expert tips, and actionable solutions to protect your relationship. 🕵️♂️ 👉 Join Now https://t.me/BlackHatNexus |
| 16:58 | <Stephen Chenney> | RE language tags in the spellcheck dictionary proposal https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/12388. It was discussed, https://github.com/Igalia/explainers/issues/44, but we dropped it from the proposal and it's not in the explainer. TAG feedback did not include it as far as I know. |
| 17:14 | <bkardell> | would anyone be opposed to linking the stages document from https://github.com/whatwg/html ? It feels to me like it should be linked there or sort of 1 click removed at least, but I don't know where that would be |
| 18:41 | <jmdyck> | I think it would make sense for the README.md to mention WHATWG (e.g. "... the HTML Standard, one of many web standards developed at WHATWG"), and have that link to https://whatwg.org/. From there, the stages doc is 2 clicks away. (It's also 2 clicks away from the "Code of Conduct", which is already linked from README; however, if someone were looking for the stages doc, I wouldn't expect them to click on a "Code of Conduct" link.) |
| 19:52 | <annevk> | Luke Warlow: I wonder if we should remove styles from css-forms-1 that are in HTML as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13778 didn't make it into HTML until today for instance. |
| 19:58 | <annevk> | jmdyck: I like that idea: https://github.com/whatwg/spec-factory/pull/88 |
| 22:05 | <Luke Warlow> | Luke Warlow: I wonder if we should remove styles from css-forms-1 that are in HTML as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13778 didn't make it into HTML until today for instance. |