| 14:34 | <Tom Schuster> | Hi! I think it would be useful to have a topic for the Sanitizer. We plan on moving some of the issues from the WICG repo to HTML. |
| 14:49 | <annevk> | Tom Schuster: you should now have that power. |
| 14:52 | <Tom Schuster> | Indeed, thanks Anne! |
| 15:45 | <zcorpan> | I vibe'd https://zcorpan.github.io/whatwg-contrib-report/ LMK if something seems incorrect |
| 15:55 | <annevk> | zcorpan: it seems like it does not account for affiliation changes, which skews the numbers toward current employers significantly. |
| 15:56 | <zcorpan> | annevk: Yes. There's a disclaimer about that at the top. I couldn't think of a way to track that with available data |
| 15:57 | <annevk> | That note doesn't reflect the situation for Hixie (who left Google afaik). |
| 15:58 | <zcorpan> | Hmm hixie has no Entity affiliations in the later tables. Might be a bug |
| 15:58 | <annevk> | Also funny that Hixie is still #1 after being away for a decade plus. |
| 15:59 | <annevk> | What are we even doing. |
| 15:59 | <zcorpan> | No it's correct, the spec overview doesn't say hixie is associated with Google, just that Google is the top entity |
| 16:00 | <zcorpan> | Yeah :) The switch to PRs makes the commit count have different weight... Some PRs have 100+ commits before squashing |
| 16:02 | <annevk> | Indeed, the process has changed completely. I was kidding in case that was unclear. I would love the addition of reviewer analysis. |
| 17:26 | <dbaron> | There are also plenty of folks who have had multiple relevant affiliations over time (including Hixie, who did plenty of spec work at Opera before going to Google). |
| 17:28 | <annevk> | Yeah, that's kinda what I meant. For my share of the commits Apple benefits significantly in this overview at the cost of Mozilla and to a lesser extent (presumably) Opera. |
| 18:10 | <annevk> | (It seems it doesn’t know heycam is at Apple now, though again that would give credit to the wrong company.) |