| 10:48 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | It seems like
TabAtkins I see that there is a |
| 10:50 | <TabAtkins> | Yes new release is slightly breaking, I brought up exactly how it breaks in รพอค issue Sam raised |
| 10:51 | <TabAtkins> | That's why it's 3.x, lol |
| 10:52 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | Well, "pipx install bs-highlighter doesn't work anymore" seems enough of an error that I asumed it was not an intended breaking change :P If it's intended I'll just pin to v2 |
| 10:52 | <TabAtkins> | Oh, I see hm |
| 10:53 | <TabAtkins> | Let me test on a bit |
| 10:54 | <TabAtkins> | I'm minuting rn |
| 10:54 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | No rush, pinning to 2.0.3 is a good enough workaround for me |
| 10:54 | <TabAtkins> | Yes |
| 18:22 | <Noam Rosenthal> | If anyone is interested, I'm playing around with the new "stacked PR" feature of github and it seems kind of nice for HTML PRs. (See https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12583, scroll to the bottom and you can see the stack) I wonder if it can help with reviewing/contributing. |
| 18:22 | <Tim van der Lippe> | zcorpan: Do you mind taking a look at https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12630 ? |
| 18:22 | <Noam Rosenthal> | (https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/how-tos/stacked-pull-requests) |
| 19:19 | <jmdyck> | I don't really get how a stack of discrete pull requests is better than a stack of discrete commits within one pull request. |
| 19:24 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Each PR has its own conversations and review, I don't think you get that per commit? |
| 19:25 | <jmdyck> | Ah okay, that makes sense. |