07:49
<Tobie Langel>
hey folks, pr-preview is back up, but I need you to issue new AWS credentials for the S3 bucket that's behind whatpr.org
07:53
<Tobie Langel>
And I realize this could look like social engineering to fish for credentials, so I'll ask whoever is able to get them to reach me using another channel.
07:53
<zcorpan>
foolip: ^
07:53
<Tobie Langel>
(I believe at least annevk has my phone number.)
07:56
<foolip>
I will forward this to the person now paying for the S3 bucket.
07:59
<Tobie Langel>
In the meantime, I can put you back on the main S3 bucket. What do you prefer?
08:04
<annevk>
I think we can wait until this is fixed. Tantek has access to the account.
08:05
<annevk>
cc Tantek
08:08
<Tobie Langel>
Sorry this whole thing took so long. Timing of the outage couldn't have been worse on my end.
08:13
<annevk>

Luke Warlow freddy Frédéric: when I looked through https://github.com/w3c/trusted-types/pull/606 it largely seemed fine, but I was curious what you all think about these things:

  1. Should it be TrustedHTMLParserOptions instead of TrustedParserOptions?
  2. Why do we make these TrustedX objects reflect their internal state (in a way consumers cannot trust)? I'm not really sure I see the point in toJSON() and sanitizer() and such, but I guess it also doesn't really matter.
08:14
<Tobie Langel>
The apps are now hosted with a new service provider and the repos are in a dedicated GH org.
08:15
<Tobie Langel>
It would be good to discuss longer terms plans for these services once the outage is fully behind us.
08:16
<Tobie Langel>
W3C offered to take over Specref but seems only mildly interested in supporting PR Preview long term.
08:17
<Ms2ger>
That's too bad
08:23
<annevk>
Tobie Langel: no worries, hope all is well! And yes, figuring out a longer-term plan would be good. I wonder if we can migrate it to CI somehow. (For which we don't really have a sustainable solution either, but it's unlikely it'll completely disappear.)
08:25
<zcorpan>
annevk: empty poster was discussed in https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6636#issuecomment-2610027765 + next few comments. Do you think the feature-testing by currentPoster changes it enough to reconsider empty poster?
08:35
<annevk>
Yeah, Jake Archibald pointed that out at the time too. I don't think we gave it enough consideration. Interesting to see that even <poster> was considered.
08:36
<Luke Warlow>
1. I guess it depends what the future plans with XML are. I think leaving it as just TrustedParserOptions is probably fine, but not strong either way. 2. I agree they seem largely pointless but also it's already there on the existing interfaces and I don't think it matters too much. Nic opened an issue around making them immutable in some way.
08:37
<zcorpan>
Can you comment in https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10378 ?
09:07
<Noam Rosenthal>
cannot trust because someone can mangle the prototypes?
09:16
<Noam Rosenthal>
I also don't mind removing the API for now. It's easier to add it later than to remove it
09:21
<Noam Rosenthal>
Perhaps TrustedHTMLParserOptions is more explicit about it currently not supporting XML... I don't mind changing it
09:24
<annevk>
Yes prototypes can be mangled. If nicolo-ribaudo wants them trusted it’s probably better to not expose anything for now.
09:43
<Noam Rosenthal>
renamed to TrustedHTMLParserOptions without members. We can add interface members for it in the future after we figure out the mangling thing for TrustedHTML
10:05
<smaug>
zcorpan: annevk remind me, where are we with ORB and getting that to the spec?
10:27
<zcorpan>
smaug: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1755 needs an edit to HTML. I can try to fix it this week
10:30
<zcorpan>
smaug: that also links to https://github.com/annevk/orb/labels/mvp
11:44
<Tobie Langel>
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2026JulSep/0006.html
11:46
<Tobie Langel>
Update to the specprod mailing list and link to the GH issues on deciding what's next long term for these services.
12:04
<annevk>
smaug: I think Google & Mozilla ended up not quite following the specification and nobody wrote up what you all did instead?
12:06
<Tobie Langel>
FYI, it sounds like W3C is planning to host their own PR Preview moving forward: https://github.com/specinfra/pr-preview/pull/209
12:53
<smaug>
farre might be able to tell all the required tweaks (required because of webcompat)
12:56
<farre>
yep, I should be able to assist