| 03:15 | <zcorpan> | sideshowbarker: what's the current thinking around document conformance tests? |
| 03:19 | <sideshowbarker> | In what context? For the HTML checker, I moved them all in-tree. So the ones in WPT are stale and I guess I should remove them from WPT. |
| 03:25 | <zcorpan> | sideshowbarker: yeah, for style in body but also in general. Yeah let's remove from wpt |
| 03:36 | <zcorpan> | Interestingly the opposite development compared to html5lib-tests |
| 03:40 | <sideshowbarker> | Me putting the document-conformance tests into WPT to begin with was just aspirational. I'd imagined it'd encourage people other than me to contribute more. But it never really had that effect in practice. |
| 07:11 | <annevk> | Yeah okay. I'm not sure there is a lot of point to it given all the restrictions that exist on referrer by default these days, but consistency is always nice. |
| 12:54 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Yes - those (as well as append/prepend) are not in a mixin. but before/after/replaceWith are |
| 17:53 | <freddy> | true |
| 17:54 | <freddy> | (though admittedly I don't know what the cross-browser situation looks like) |