| 18:10 | <littledan> | interesting comparison for remote meetings: https://w3c.github.io/Guide/meetings/continuity.html (I don't think we're anywhere near this yet) |
| 18:11 | <littledan> | (this is about emergency situations; not related to "remote plenary") |
| 18:15 | <rkirsling> | could be directly relevant if the coronavirus situation doesn't improve though 🤔 |
| 18:17 | <rkirsling> | we're already under an indefinite travel ban (though I can still make it to Cupertino since it's local) |
| 18:33 | <shu> | interesting advisory indeed |
| 18:44 | <ljharb> | the september meeting in tokyo seems potentially affected |
| 18:51 | <shu> | cdc has a level 2 travel notice on japan right now |
| 18:52 | <shu> | september is 7 months away but it looks like china is winding down while outbreak is speeding up outside of china, so potentially affects is probably right? |
| 22:41 | <shu> | ljharb: mind submitting a quick PR to test262 to fix the Atomics.store -0/+0 test? |
| 22:41 | <shu> | ljharb: there is no assert.ok in the test262 harness |
| 22:41 | <shu> | ljharb: think you want the plain assert() |
| 22:43 | <shu> | actually i'll submit one, could've done it by the time i typed out the messages :) |
| 23:20 | <ljharb> | shu: oops, my bad |
| 23:20 | <ljharb> | there's an assert.ok in node, so i assumed it'd be in test262 |