| 07:51 | <devsnek> | it seems i'm an openjs foundation delegate now :D |
| 07:59 | <robpalme> | yay |
| 19:34 | <chicoxyzzy> | congrats devsnek! |
| 20:05 | <rkirsling> | noice |
| 21:16 | <leobalter> | if anyone else here is in the Bay Area and with trouble to attend the meeting remotely, please let me know |
| 21:22 | <shu> | bradleymeck: ping |
| 21:25 | <bradleymeck> | Pong |
| 21:55 | <devsnek> | could someone please move me from the invited expert team to the delegate team on github |
| 21:57 | <leobalter> | devsnek congrats! on the team, you should probably ping one of the chairs |
| 21:59 | <devsnek> | akirose: perhaps? |
| 22:00 | <akirose> | done |
| 22:01 | <devsnek> | thank you :) |
| 22:22 | <Bakkot> | jridgewell: is logical assignment intending to go for stage 3 at this meeting? if so you should ask the editors for a review |
| 22:22 | <jridgewell> | Do editors review at before 3 or 4? |
| 22:25 | <Bakkot> | https://tc39.es/process-document/ |
| 22:27 | <Bakkot> | stage 3 enterance criteria requires "All ECMAScript editors have signed off on the current spec text" |
| 22:27 | <jridgewell> | Ahh |
| 22:28 | <jridgewell> | Well… You want to review it? |
| 22:29 | <jridgewell> | :wink |
| 22:29 | <jridgewell> | 😉 |
| 22:29 | <Bakkot> | yes but when you're going for stage 3 affects how we prioritize it |
| 22:30 | <jridgewell> | Yah, I meant to advance this meeting since Daniel agreed to short-circuit semantics |
| 22:32 | <jridgewell> | I'll make an issue now |
| 22:59 | <devsnek> | jridgewell: are there any tests for logical assignment? |
| 22:59 | <jridgewell> | Not yet |
| 23:09 | <devsnek> | jridgewell: unsure of conformance but it appears to work https://gc.gy/51673181.png |
| 23:13 | <jridgewell> | Can you point me to the code? |
