| 00:00 | <ljharb> | rickbutton: i was kind of thinking you'd be able to define `adder` as a closure around the List |
| 02:52 | <rickbutton> | oh duh |
| 04:42 | <Bakkot> | I want to second littledan's suggestion that we default to #tc39 unless there's a reason the discussion only makes sense among delegates |
| 04:42 | <Bakkot> | yeah there's always inertia and all, and it's not a big deal if something is here rather than there, just a thing to keep in mind |
| 04:45 | <rkirsling> | yep it's a good reminder |
| 14:49 | <rickbutton> | +1 will do, thanks for the reminder |
| 20:04 | <rkirsling> | hmmm if leobalter is changing his acronym I might hop on that train too |
| 20:10 | <leobalter> | I’ve had people asking me if R from LBR is an initial for some actual last name |
| 20:11 | <leobalter> | Which is not and I don’t want to continue explaining that from time to time |
| 20:11 | <rkirsling> | ah I mean, that's an inherent problem with our acronymization scheme for sure, for anybody with >2 name parts |
| 20:15 | <ljharb> | mine's the same way, JHD |
| 20:15 | <ljharb> | jafar nabbed JH first :-p |
| 20:17 | <rkirsling> | ljharb: oh man and it's easy for people to forget that your last name ends in a D ha |
| 20:17 | <shu> | you gotta start spelling it like a 70s/80s band art |
| 20:18 | <shu> | HarbanD |
| 20:18 | <ljharb> | i did purchase the domain `har.band` |
| 20:18 | <ljharb> | so i got that going for me |
| 20:18 | <rkirsling> | is it like a band that distributes their work in HAR files |
| 20:18 | <rkirsling> | (am I trying too hard) |
| 20:18 | <ljharb> | lol yes. but i haven't yet decided what my signature joke will be for that domain name |
| 20:20 | <ljharb> | (iow, submissions accepted) |
| 20:22 | <rkirsling> | guess it could be hairband without the I |
| 20:23 | <rkirsling> | or "there's no I in Harband" |
| 20:37 | <devsnek> | but there is in standardization |
| 20:40 | <rkirsling> | damn. |
| 20:45 | <shu> | there're two |
| 20:46 | <rkirsling> | but no u |
| 20:47 | <ljharb> | could always do british spelling and go with "standardizatioun" |
| 20:47 | <ljharb> | oh wait, "standardisatioun" |
| 20:47 | <ljharb> | :-p |
| 21:10 | <rkirsling> | oh leobalter I just realized you pinged an unrelated Yulia here: https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/2667#issuecomment-647685804 |
| 21:10 | <rkirsling> | she's @codehag on GH |
| 21:17 | <leobalter> | heh |
| 21:17 | <leobalter> | thanks! I fixed it |
| 21:19 | <rkirsling> | not super sure what the best way to resolve that discussion is though |
| 22:42 | <leobalter> | Sometimes I wonder if we should rename AssignmentExpression to SingleExpression in order to quickly differentiate it from Expression |
| 22:43 | <leobalter> | LonelyExpression... I should move this to tdz... |
| 23:58 | <rkirsling> | oh wait this is interesting |