00:31
<shu>
Bakkot: did we not need to disallow `for await (async of`?
00:32
<Bakkot>
we did not
00:32
<devsnek>
if `for await` is valid, `async` isn't a valid identifier, right?
00:32
<Bakkot>
because the ambiguity only arises for `;;` vs `of` loops
00:33
<Bakkot>
that is, since `for await (async of => 0;` isn't the valid start of a statement, there's no ambiguity
00:33
<Bakkot>
devsnek alas, no
00:33
<Bakkot>
only `await`
00:33
<devsnek>
:(
00:35
<shu>
ah, because there's no for await (;;), ok
00:35
<shu>
cool