| 14:56 | <ljharb> | rkirsling: since you're all paged in with typed array stuff, do you have thoughts on https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1556 ? is it still needed, a bad change, a change that's already happened, something else? |
| 16:41 | <ljharb> | devsnek: looks like if you can make this last change, this PR and then the spec one can land? https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/2878#issuecomment-786010018 |
| 16:47 | <devsnek> | ljharb: done |
| 17:02 | <littledan> | Incubator call for module blocks starting now |
| 17:02 | <littledan> | ljharb: Do you want to join? |
| 17:02 | <littledan> | or, anyone else? DM me for the link |
| 17:04 | <ljharb> | i've got another meeting this hour, sorry |
| 19:26 | <rkirsling> | ljharb: hmm, interesting |
| 19:26 | <rkirsling> | looks like JSC still differs as before |
| 19:28 | <rkirsling> | oh wow also somehow I overlooked the fact that I was pinged on this yesterday |
| 19:29 | <rkirsling> | I guess if shu already got consensus and the current engine results are the same as before, then we should go forward with the PR, yeah |
| 19:45 | <ljharb> | shu: is https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1556 what you got consensus for? |
| 20:06 | <rkirsling> | yeah https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/1541#issuecomment-785508810 |
| 20:11 | <ljharb> | nice, ok |