01:39
<Dashiva>
Oh wow
01:40
<Dashiva>
Email suggesting to replace <canvas>fallback</canvas> with <img src="fallback.gif">
01:42
<Lachy>
Dashiva: it's best to just ignore Andrew's emails. He rarely says anything sensible
01:43
<Dashiva>
... Isee
01:47
<ajnewbold>
woo! utterly useless: http://newbold.name/gradient/?start=339966&end=CCFF99&height=300
01:48
<ajnewbold>
anyone know GD functions and want to help me turn that into something that makes an image?
01:48
<ajnewbold>
I'd ask in ##php but I'm banned, heh
01:49
<Dashiva>
That doesn't look very 300px to me
01:49
<ajnewbold>
hmm
01:49
<ajnewbold>
what browser?
01:50
<Dashiva>
IE and Opera
01:50
<ajnewbold>
hmm
01:50
<ajnewbold>
does it look higher or lower?
01:50
<Dashiva>
It's more like 3000px
01:50
<ajnewbold>
OH HOLY CRAP
01:50
<ajnewbold>
yeah
01:50
<ajnewbold>
I just looked at it in Opera
01:51
<ajnewbold>
now this is interesting
01:51
<ajnewbold>
it's a bunch of divs, each 1px high
01:51
<ajnewbold>
300 of them
01:51
<ajnewbold>
why would that stack up to more than 300px?
01:51
<ajnewbold>
it still looks smooth, interesting
01:51
<Dashiva>
Because they aren't actually 1px high
01:51
<ajnewbold>
oh
01:51
<ajnewbold>
ohhhhh
01:51
<ajnewbold>
nvm, I see what I did
01:51
ajnewbold
growls at himself
01:52
<ajnewbold>
Dashiva: try again now :)
01:52
<Dashiva>
Still 3000 in IE, but 300 in Opera
01:54
<ajnewbold>
hmmm
01:54
<ajnewbold>
Dashiva: I don't have IE :(
01:54
<ajnewbold>
any idea what IE's problem might be?
01:54
<ajnewbold>
is it freaking out that I don't have a doctype or something?
01:55
<ajnewbold>
or... <body> ... heh
01:55
ajnewbold
cleans things up
01:57
<Dashiva>
You might want to outsource height to a stylesheet, and the width is somewhat redundant
01:58
<Dashiva>
Okay, workie in IE
01:59
<ajnewbold>
Dashiva: heh, funny
01:59
<ajnewbold>
so all IE wanted was valid, well-formed source
01:59
<ajnewbold>
that's a new one
01:59
<Dashiva>
There's a reason they call it quirks mode
01:59
<ajnewbold>
ah
02:00
<ajnewbold>
well, what I'd like to do is generate an image file
02:00
<ajnewbold>
I'm sure lots of people out there just want simple gradients to use as backgrounds, but don't want to mess with graphics apps just to make them
02:01
<ajnewbold>
ah, nevermind
02:01
<ajnewbold>
http://calebegg.com/grad/ someone's already done it
02:01
<Dashiva>
Have the server run opera, firefox or safari, generate the gradient on a canvas, toDataUrl the canvas into a new window, "save as" that image, and serve it to the user
02:02
<ajnewbold>
canvas, hmm
02:02
<ajnewbold>
I really need to learn more about that
02:02
<Dashiva>
(The above is not to be taken as a serious suggestion)
02:02
<ajnewbold>
oh
02:02
<ajnewbold>
I take everything seriously
02:03
<ajnewbold>
it's a horrible personality flaw
02:03
<Dashiva>
There are many ways to do it, really
09:19
<met_>
http://vocamus.net/dave/?p=39
09:21
<annevk>
interesting
09:21
<Hixie>
hey
09:21
<annevk>
morning
09:22
<hsivonen>
morning
09:22
<met_>
good morning
09:22
<met_>
and the ussage in the example http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/~bts630_071g07/canvas/BargraphExample.xhtml
09:22
<met_>
altough not valid of course
10:35
<Lachy>
Hey Hixie
10:50
<Hixie>
hey
11:20
<annevk>
Does Chris Wilson mean that the CSS fixes they will be doing will solely apply to Really We Mean it this Time Standards Mode?
11:21
<annevk>
I'm not really sure I understand his example with floats as other browsers likely render those sites ok...
11:24
<hsivonen>
looks like Dreamhost is having an outage again
11:24
<annevk>
yeah
11:25
<annevk>
whatwg.org down, html5.org down
11:25
<annevk>
etc.
11:28
<hsivonen>
once the easter holidays are over, someone has to raise the issue of adopting HTML5 in the HTML WG. the current situation is unproductive
11:29
annevk
wonders how that will go
11:29
<hsivonen>
I have a draft email
11:32
<met_>
annevk, any way of voting? (dunno who can start voting in html wg)
11:33
<annevk>
I suppose voting could work
11:33
<webben>
would the main bar to that be Microsoft?
11:33
<webben>
or the xforms-lite folks?
11:34
<annevk>
I'm not sure what the position of either is
11:34
<annevk>
Doesn't really matter much at this point
11:35
<annevk>
It starts getting interesting once another draft + editor is being put forward
11:35
<annevk>
but I don't really see that happening
11:35
<webben>
how come? just general pessimism about the process?
11:36
<webben>
oh wait you mean another as in additional to whatwg's html5?
11:36
<annevk>
Yes
11:44
<hendry>
dreamhost are a tad unreliable :/
12:21
<Dashiva>
Considering even the expert group making up the WG can't get acronyms and initialisms right (or even agree what is right), why are we still chasing after the idea that average authors will?
12:52
<Lachy>
Hey Hixie, I finally started playing around with irssi.
12:52
<Lachy>
it's not as hard as I initially thought it would be, but there are still many things I need to learn about it.
13:57
<annevk>
<figure> should work inside <p>
13:57
<annevk>
much like <random> works
15:20
<hsivonen>
annevk: nice for HTML5. less nice for the schema handling of struct-inline and text/html...
15:21
<hsivonen>
annevk: I'll comment on the list. thanks
16:03
<annevk>
http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2007/04/08/dns-issues-causing-possible-site-and-email-downtime/
18:48
<annevk>
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/04/html_5.html
23:47
<Lachy>
the idea for the generic script data attr is interesting.
23:48
<Lachy>
I've used class="" in the past for such things
23:48
<Dashiva>
Yeah, and I predict that if role is ever made common, people will use role for it too
23:49
<Lachy>
If they did, it would be abuse
23:49
<Lachy>
but I doubt role will ever become successful
23:50
<Dashiva>
As long as the validator didn't complain, that's all that would matter
23:50
<Lachy>
I'd like to know more about the use cases ppk has in mind for it
23:51
<Lachy>
I'll ask him.
23:51
<Dashiva>
An example would be declarative form validation before wf2
23:51
<webben>
Lachy, Isn't role already becoming successful for a tech that hasn't even been standardized yet?
23:51
<webben>
(leaving aside the Q of whether role is well specced)
23:52
<Dashiva>
You could either make up attributes and face invalidation (scary) or use class
23:52
<Lachy>
only in a very limited market
23:53
<Lachy>
I haven't seen it used beyond a few experimental pages so far
23:53
<webben>
I think Dojo are either using it or planning on using it.
23:53
<Lachy>
what for?
23:54
<webben>
Lachy, WAI
23:54
<webben>
(ARIA support in FF and major screen readers)
23:54
<Lachy>
for what purpose?
23:54
<webben>
increased accessibility of weird widgets
23:54
<webben>
and (I suppose) live regions
23:55
<Lachy>
I don't understand what it's for. HTML5 elements and form controls seem to cover everything role does, and more
23:55
<webben>
see e.g. http://dojotoolkit.org/node/549
23:55
<webben>
Lachy, I'm not sure HTML5 yet has a way of expressing the priority of live updates?
23:56
<webben>
Lachy, might as well ask what Dojo is for
23:56
<webben>
the important thing is that Dojo apps if built be made accessible, i think
23:58
<webben>
Lachy, I suspect at least some of this reflects authors' desire to style form widgets
23:58
<webben>
but I don't really know
23:59
<Lachy>
styled form controls are a problem that CSS will solve
23:59
<webben>
do we have HTML5 tree widgets?