| 00:01 | <Dashiva> | Web 2.0 Service Pack 1 |
| 00:12 | <othermaciej> | oh I see |
| 00:21 | <marl> | Dashiva: what is this web 2.0 service pack? |
| 00:21 | <Dashiva> | This: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/UnNews:Web_2.0_Service_Pack_1_to_be_released |
| 00:23 | <othermaciej> | it's a joke |
| 06:38 | <yod> | karl, tu as toujours ton script pour recuperer tout ce que tu as fait sur cvs? |
| 06:39 | <yod> | aha, wrong window, sorry |
| 14:46 | <zcorpan> | yay! i catched up with whatwg mail. now i can dive into public-html (227 mails) |
| 14:46 | <MikeSmith> | zcorpan - enjoy |
| 16:47 | <zcorpan> | oooook. i think it's time to skip the rest of the ping thread |
| 16:48 | <zcorpan> | please tell me if there's a message in that thread i should have read |
| 16:48 | zcorpan | calls it a day |
| 21:31 | Hixie | adds two more steps to his spec generating pipeline |
| 21:31 | <Hixie> | it now runs the w3c pubrules checker (which includes a validator step) every time i generate the spec |
| 21:32 | <Hixie> | output is here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/pubrules-conformance-report.html |
| 21:35 | <mitsuhiko> | hmm. i somehow have troubles contacting mark pilgrim :( |
| 21:39 | <markp> | mitsuhiko: you rang? |
| 21:40 | <mitsuhiko> | ah. yes i did :) |
| 21:40 | <mitsuhiko> | markp: are there plans to make the sanitizing in the feedparser optional? |
| 21:40 | <mitsuhiko> | i don't need it because i have to preprocess it with html5lib anyways |
| 21:41 | <markp> | that's a good question |
| 21:41 | <markp> | there has been some rumbling about replacing large chunks of feedparser with html5lib |
| 21:42 | <markp> | esp. now that it has sanitizing built-in |
| 21:42 | <mitsuhiko> | (thoug i'm using a subclass of the sinitizing filter that removes script tags instead of escaping it) |
| 21:42 | <mitsuhiko> | because there are countless blogs with those annoying digg buttons |
| 21:45 | <mitsuhiko> | markp: oh. and kudos, the lib rocks :) |
| 21:56 | <jgraham> | mitsuhiko: If you want to create a patch for making the sanitizer optionally discard rather than escape, it would be welcome |
| 21:58 | <mitsuhiko> | jgraham: sure |
| 21:59 | <mitsuhiko> | jgraham: can filters assume that they operate on a valid stream? |
| 21:59 | <mitsuhiko> | say, that for each StartTag an EndTag is emitted? |
| 22:02 | <jgraham> | mitsuhiko: It depends where you're putting the filter. If it is a filter that operates on a treewalker stream, then yes, modulo void elements e.g. <img>. If you're operating at the tokenizer-treebuilder boundary (like the existing sanitizer can), no. |
| 22:14 | <mitsuhiko> | jgraham: i must admit that i was too lazy to read it up and it worked for my planet: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/10696 |
| 22:15 | <mitsuhiko> | don't know if it's useful for anyone else out there |