00:32
<jwalden>
somebody in here should fix the note on <http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Web_ECMAScript>; about eval: a use of eval not called "eval" does not necessarily work according to ECMA-262 ed. 3; see section 16, and note that (mentally fixing borken spacing due to a half-broken PDF) "An i mpl ement at i on may t r eat any i nst ance of t he f ol l owi ng ki nds of r unt i me er r or s as a synt ax er r...
00:32
<jwalden>
...or and therefore r epor t i t ear l y: • Usi ng t he eval propert y ot her t han vi a a di rect cal l ."
00:32
<jwalden>
var x = eval; // not a direct call
00:32
<Hixie>
it's a wiki, you are welcome to edit it :-)
00:32
<jwalden>
I don't think I have a login yet, and I'm preoccupied right now :-)
01:54
<Hixie>
crap, i don't know how to do multi-row selection in <datagrid>
02:03
<karlcow>
I'm using style attributes most of the time for very local and specific style rule (which font element doesn't cover). Such as modifying the style of an image for a one time. <img style="float:right;margin-left:1em;width:350px;" …/> I haven't found a better way of doing it.
02:12
<Hixie>
ok, <datagrid> mark II is now checked in
02:12
<Hixie>
i'm sure it has issues
02:12
<Hixie>
e.g. the content model makes no sense anymore
09:00
<jgraham>
jwalden: The point re: eval is that ES5 allows x = eval; x() to throw but browsers don't do that, they call something like eval but possibly in a different scope
09:01
<jgraham>
So it seems at least plausible that there are sites that rely on that not throwing
09:23
<zcorpan_>
"HTML 5 is at least as far off implementation as XHTML 2 is. There is nowhere near as much need to discuss XHTML 2 because it is a finished stable product just waiting to be implemented. It will probably be at least another 10 years (if ever) before HTML 5 reaches that same point." -- http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4226031#post4226031
09:47
<zcorpan_>
Hixie: s/Either: Nothing./Either: Empty./
09:49
zcorpan_
wonders whether <datalist>foo<table></table></datalist> is allowed
10:10
<annevk2>
zcorpan_, that's a fun quote
10:17
gsnedders
is missing 5.85
10:17
<gsnedders>
(GBP)
10:29
<zcorpan_>
hmm, maybe the last argument to addColumn() should be *in*visible? it's weird when absent argument is the same as true
11:10
<takkaria>
zcorpan_: hmm, interesting thread
11:10
<takkaria>
apparently "it is impossible to write documents about Julius Cesar, Moses or dinosaurs using HTML 5" on teh third thread
11:13
<takkaria>
*third page
11:41
<gsnedders>
Hmm, breakfast is starting to be rather tempting
14:17
gsnedders
slaps last.fm for having no pause button
15:04
<takkaria>
if the HTTP WG care more about theoretical purity than having people actually implement the spec as written, they should rename the Referer header Referrer
15:09
<Philip`>
takkaria: But that would break non-browser UAs, which is unacceptable
15:09
<Philip`>
(Browsers deserve to be broken because they ignore the current specs anyway)
20:34
<annevk2>
hmm, can you post arbitrary HTML to www-archive?
20:34
<annevk2>
if you then slip such a link to a W3C Member you can presumably read all kinds of information from Member only pages
20:34
<annevk2>
seems dangerous
20:36
<Philip`>
annevk2: I guess it would be contained within lists.w3.org, and you couldn't access www.w3.org?
20:37
<Philip`>
(but it seems nobody has cared to fix http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-validator/2009Mar/0005.html so you can access Member-only pages on www.w3.org anyway)
20:53
<annevk2>
Philip`, there is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/
21:07
<annevk2>
"Seven Things You Probably Don't Know About Me"... hmm
21:08
<annevk2>
1. I stopped doing memes. 2-7. See 1. Harharhar.
21:09
<gsnedders>
:P
21:09
<annevk2>
What would be the appropriate markup for such a list?
21:10
<gsnedders>
<ol><li value=1>I stopped doing memes.<li min=2 max=7>See 1.</ol><p>Harharhar.
21:10
<gsnedders>
(I know that doesn't work.)
21:10
<gsnedders>
For those who don't read what I blog within two minutes: http://gsnedders.com/seven-things-you-probably-dont-know-about-me
21:10
<Philip`>
<p>1. I stopped doing memes. 2-7. See 1. Harharhar.</p>
21:15
<annevk2>
http://bitworking.org/news/425/atompub-is-a-failure he's blaming browsers in a non-negative way; that's new
21:29
Philip`
might be more interested in AtomPub if he actually had any idea what it was
21:29
<Philip`>
I must have read dozens of blog posts talking about it, and I still have no idea
21:33
<annevk2>
it's a protocol to manipulate content over HTTP
21:33
gsnedders
needs to stop doing pointless Facebook quizzes
21:36
<annevk2>
Philip`, if that is too abstract you might just want to read the spec: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023
21:36
<Philip`>
HTTP is a protocol that lets me manipulate content over HTTP :-)
21:37
<Philip`>
annevk2: I think that's a bit too concrete
21:38
<annevk2>
Philip`, get over it
21:44
<sayrer>
Philip`: it's just a way to sequence certain kinds of HTTP requests. A protocol, if you will.
21:50
gsnedders
wonders how to not panic at the prospect of a phone interview
21:50
<Dashiva>
Talk to strangers on the phone in advance
21:50
<Dashiva>
Have your friends prank call you at random times of day to answer questions
21:50
<gsnedders>
But that's scary!
21:51
<Dashiva>
Realize that in reality, the phone is scared of you
21:51
<gsnedders>
Also, if I do that, they'll likely phone up at 2am, drunk, asking for pizza.
22:22
<gsnedders>
annevk2: I do like your second latest blog post.