00:01
<TabAtkins>
Wow, most complex chord I've ever had to type. Ctrl+Shift+Alt+S
00:03
<peol>
export for web devices?
00:03
<Hixie>
TabAtkins: not an emacs user i assume
00:04
<TabAtkins>
peol: Well, sorta. Generate db schema in HTML.
00:04
<TabAtkins>
Hixie: No, and that's why.
00:04
<TabAtkins>
Hixie: Also, elisp. Yuck. Worst extant dialect of Lisp ever.
00:04
<Hixie>
hehe
00:05
<TabAtkins>
peol: What program does that option match with this chord?
00:05
<peol>
TabAtkins: Photoshop
00:05
<TabAtkins>
Ah, kk.
00:05
<peol>
i think, at least :)
00:05
<TabAtkins>
I'm a GIMP user, so I wouldn't know.
00:06
<peol>
i run cs4 through a xp vm :p
00:06
<peol>
gonna start using gimp when get around to grab the latest which has all windows encapsulated
00:07
<TabAtkins>
woo, dinnertime!
00:07
TabAtkins
omnomnoms.
00:12
<AryehGregor>
Has there ever been rel="edit" in the spec?
00:22
cardona507
just registered for Google I/O
00:22
<cardona507>
anyone else going?
00:25
<AryehGregor>
Why would you want to embed media via QuickTime if you have video and audio?
00:26
<Philip`>
Maybe you want to use those totally useful "3D" QuickTime things where you can rotate the view
00:32
<AryehGregor>
You mean like you can do with <canvas>?
00:32
AryehGregor
looks questioningly at othermaciej
00:35
<othermaciej>
pardon?
00:35
<AryehGregor>
Why would you want to embed media via QuickTime if you have video and audio?
00:35
<AryehGregor>
(in reference to a mailing list post of your from a few hours ago)
00:36
<othermaciej>
1) if you want to target browsers that don't have <video> yet
00:36
<othermaciej>
2) if you want to target browsers that don't support your codec of choice in <video>
00:36
<othermaciej>
3) if you want to embed content types that are supported by the QuickTime plugin but not any browser's <video> or <audio> because they are not strictly speaking either video or audio, such as QuickTime VR content or Quartz Composer content
00:36
<AryehGregor>
Yes, but in the context of the thread we're talking about <iframe sandbox>. I'm pretty sure all browsers that support that would support <video> . . . and with any luck they'll also have settled on a common codec.
00:37
<AryehGregor>
Okay, I guess.
00:37
<othermaciej>
just tryin' to answer your question
00:37
<othermaciej>
I am not saying I <3 the QuickTime plugin
00:37
<Philip`>
4) Maybe you hate your users and want to make their browsers slow and crashy
00:37
<AryehGregor>
Nah, it would be easier to use Flash then.
00:39
<AryehGregor>
As one participant in this conversation can attest, judging by his recent fascinating post to public-html today. :)
00:40
AryehGregor
somehow managed to get Flash consistently crashing Linux Chrome, when Chrome is supposed to be immune to plugin crashes.
00:40
<Dashiva>
Maybe it's a feature
00:41
Philip`
disables plugins in his main browser, and has a different browser that he uses almost solely for Flash sites
00:41
<AryehGregor>
Philip`, me too, but only because plugins don't seem to work with my Linux Chrome yet.
00:41
<AryehGregor>
If YouTube used <video>, I'd be set.
00:44
AryehGregor
prays.
00:45
<AryehGregor>
I wonder what the status on <video>-in-YouTube is. Sadly, I imagine it's "shelve it until <video> is actually better".
00:45
Dashiva
imagines a service that takes a non-<video> video as input and gives a <video> <source> as output
00:46
<Dashiva>
Probably expensive bandwidth-wise, but you could throw in ads and stuff maybe :)
00:46
<Hixie>
still not jgraham?
00:46
<Hixie>
gsnedders?
00:46
<Hixie>
s/not/no/
00:58
<othermaciej>
AryehGregor: to be fair, Flash was hanging, not crashing
01:01
<AryehGregor>
Oh, well, that's okay, then.
01:02
<Hixie>
hey, ws: and wss: are registered now
01:02
<Hixie>
http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html
01:13
<AryehGregor>
I especially like #9 here: http://www.11points.com/News-Politics/11_Hilarious_(and_Very_Necessary)_Newspaper_Corrections
01:13
<AryehGregor>
(totally off-topic)
01:21
<Dashiva>
That kind of journalistic integrity is rare nowadays