| 13:58 | <boblet> | hey all. what happened on the omnibus element removal change? is that still ongoing? |
| 13:59 | <boblet> | (issue 91, 93, 95-7 etc) |
| 21:06 | <jgraham> | Gah, people with questions that I should have answered that failed to stick around until I could actually answer them |
| 21:06 | <jgraham> | for the record, I think ElementTree is somewhat broken in html5lib 0.90; if you use namespaceHTMLElements=False it returns nothing |
| 21:06 | <jgraham> | This is fixed on trunk |
| 21:08 | <jgraham> | (oh sorry it is broken with namespaceHTMLElements=True) |
| 21:08 | <jgraham> | http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/issues/detail?id=138 |
| 21:09 | <jgraham> | Also, STIX fonts? That must explain the flying pigs |
| 21:09 | <jgraham> | and the sunshine in Sweden |
| 21:26 | <gsnedders> | jgraham: I guess there ought to be a 0.91 |
| 21:33 | <jgraham> | Well there ought to be a 1.0 too... |
| 21:34 | <jgraham> | (but 0.91 might be more achieveable) |
| 21:50 | <gsnedders> | jgraham: There ought to be many things. |
| 21:56 | <Philip`> | gsnedders: There ought to be few things |
| 21:57 | <Philip`> | There's enough things already :-( |
| 22:21 | <krijn> | If a site doesn't work with html5.enable on in Fx, does anybody in here care? |
| 22:21 | <gsnedders> | krijn: hsivonen |
| 22:21 | <krijn> | I thought so |
| 22:21 | <krijn> | http://www.doctors-inc.com/ |
| 22:22 | <krijn> | There's a comment open in the <style> tag, but it's never closed |
| 22:22 | <gsnedders> | Hah. Are we going to have to copy what's done for script into style? |
| 22:23 | <krijn> | Obviously a bug on that site, but it's working in browsers.. |
| 22:24 | <Philip`> | It looks like it parses correctly in http://parsetree.validator.nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doctors-inc.com%2F |
| 22:24 | <Philip`> | Are you using a recent Firefox nightly? |
| 22:24 | <krijn> | No |
| 22:24 | <krijn> | Probably fixed? |
| 22:24 | <gsnedders> | Probably |
| 22:25 | <Philip`> | 3.6? |
| 22:25 | <krijn> | Okidoki, nothing to see here, move along |
| 22:25 | <krijn> | Philip`: yes |
| 22:25 | <Philip`> | That's apparently ancient and never intended to be usable |
| 22:26 | <Philip`> | (The new parser was committed just before the 3.6 release branched off, or something like that, if I remember correctly) |
| 22:27 | <krijn> | But I can't order a breast enlargement now! |
| 22:27 | <jgraham> | gsnedders: The ought to be many things indeed |
| 22:27 | <gsnedders> | Noooooooo... |
| 22:28 | <jgraham> | gsnedders: But no red |
| 22:28 | <gsnedders> | jgraham: That's not what you changed my whiteboard to say. |
| 22:28 | <jgraham> | Your whiteboard should say sleep++ |
| 22:28 | <jgraham> | gn |
| 22:28 | <gsnedders> | nn |
| 22:28 | <gsnedders> | See you tomorrow (unfortenately) |
| 22:29 | <jgraham> | I see you forgot all the lessons in charm already |
| 22:29 | <jgraham> | :p |
| 22:29 | <gsnedders> | :D |
| 22:29 | <gsnedders> | You were talking about how I should treat a girl, not about guys. |
| 22:30 | <gsnedders> | s/a girl/girls/ |
| 22:33 | <gsnedders> | (To avoid ambiguity in the fact that I meant "a girl" meaning "any girl") |