| 01:23 | <Hixie> | the example in http://www.w3.org/mid/OF4F72E8FE.125DCAF7-ON86257802.006B919E-86257802.006F01F1⊙uic confuses me |
| 01:24 | <Hixie> | why would one use <div role="checkbox" aria-checked="true" tabindex="0"> rather than <input type=checkbox checked> ? |
| 01:24 | <Hixie> | i mean, it can't be for styling, since it's in a <div> fallback section |
| 01:24 | <Hixie> | so why...? |
| 03:22 | <Yuhong> | Now that XHTML2 is dead, I wonder what will happen to www-html and www-html-editor? |
| 03:51 | <Yuhong> | Now that XHTML2 is dead, I wonder what will happen to www-html and www-html-editor? |
| 04:29 | <oojacoboo> | anyone here working with @font-face on firefox? |
| 04:30 | <oojacoboo> | I have a unique situation where, since the latest firefox 4b8 update, the font has changed... |
| 04:30 | <oojacoboo> | and chrome displays the font differently from firefox |
| 04:54 | <roc> | Windows? |
| 04:54 | <oojacoboo> | roc: mac |
| 04:54 | <roc> | we use DirectWrite, Chrome doesn't |
| 04:54 | <roc> | hmm |
| 04:54 | <roc> | what's different? the shaping? |
| 04:54 | <oojacoboo> | size, weight |
| 04:55 | <roc> | nothing springs to mind |
| 04:55 | <oojacoboo> | ugh |
| 04:56 | <oojacoboo> | @font-face is a disaster |
| 04:56 | <oojacoboo> | it's a great idea, but I have experienced nothing but issues |
| 04:59 | <oojacoboo> | it appears that the font-weight differs in the two |
| 04:59 | <oojacoboo> | and the font-size of course, but that's a UA discrepency since chrome rounds off font-size(es) |
| 05:00 | <oojacoboo> | not sure what triggered this in the new update though :/ |
| 07:54 | <phrearch> | morning |
| 13:50 | <annevk> | so reportedly http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme-03#section-3.1 does not match reality |
| 13:51 | <annevk> | meh |
| 13:52 | <annevk> | Hixie, we should get XBL, and especially XBL for forms, sorted out and implemented so we can get rid of most ARIA-hacks |
| 16:45 | <magol> | is there a nice html5 example... for normal web-pages. I want to see the new features for basic content writing, writing tables for tabulated data and things like that, but it's hard to find stuff that's relevant ;0 |
| 18:54 | gsnedders | is thinking of writing a browser extension to send back URLs of JS files which contain stuff that is considered bad/evil/etc. |
| 18:54 | <gsnedders> | (in terms of ES5 syntax) |