| 09:12 | <zcorpan> | Hixie: why doesn't /complete/ have the alternative style sheets? |
| 12:41 | <zcorpan> | MikeSmith: maybe you should generate a list of tests? seems pretty straight-forward to have some arrays of interesting sequence of tags |
| 12:42 | <MikeSmith> | yeah |
| 12:42 | <zcorpan> | MikeSmith: maybe harder to generate the expected output, but you can look them over manually |
| 12:42 | <MikeSmith> | true |
| 12:43 | <zcorpan> | (since the expected output is what you have implemented, so wouldn't help you with finding bugs :-) |
| 12:43 | <MikeSmith> | heh |
| 12:44 | <MikeSmith> | well, before I put much more time into it, I want to find it if hsivonen thinks the approach is OK or not |
| 12:44 | <MikeSmith> | the code I added is not elegant |
| 12:45 | <MikeSmith> | maybe Henri can think of a better way to go about it |
| 17:09 | <karlcow> | Do we have an editor version of DOMRange on dvcs.w3.org? |
| 17:09 | <karlcow> | http://html5.org/specs/dom-range.html |
| 17:23 | <espadrine> | brendaneich: is there an ecmascript-dedicated irc channel? |
| 17:25 | <karlcow> | espadrine: did you check /list |
| 17:26 | <karlcow> | it seems there is ##javascript freenode |
| 17:26 | <espadrine> | Nothing begins with #ecm at least |
| 17:27 | <bga_> | channel of jquery's schoolboys |
| 17:28 | <karlcow> | http://irc.netsplit.de/channels/?net=freenode&chat=ecmascript |
| 17:31 | <bga_> | espadrine ask your question here |
| 17:36 | <espadrine> | well, ... I was wondering how expansive was the tacit obligation of javascript engines to list their objects by time creation in a "for in" loop. |
| 17:37 | <espadrine> | s/objects/object properties/ |
| 19:39 | <Hixie> | zcorpan: because the annotations only cover the html part |
| 20:03 | <karlcow> | in which spec, window.event is supposed to be defined at all. |
| 20:09 | <Dashiva> | Is it? It's part of the IE event model |
| 20:10 | <karlcow> | Dashiva: yes. and it's everywhere in many javascripts with code redundancy |
| 20:11 | <AryehGregor> | Doesn't recent IE support the standard event model? |
| 20:12 | <Dashiva> | Yes, but it's part of the code path only taken if the standard event object is missing |
| 20:12 | <Dashiva> | @karlcow |
| 20:12 | <karlcow> | http://pastebin.com/LajxVdtd |
| 20:12 | <Dashiva> | Stuff like function(e) { if (!e) window.event |
| 20:12 | <karlcow> | yep |
| 20:13 | <Dashiva> | So there's no need to spec it, having no such property is the correct behavior |
| 20:13 | <bga_> | msdn is spec |
| 20:14 | <bga_> | https://gist.github.com/606917 :P |
| 20:14 | <karlcow> | hmmm ok was not sure other browsers were supporting it |
| 20:15 | <bga_> | <3 it |
| 20:15 | <Dashiva> | Opera may have supported it at some point, not sure |
| 20:15 | <bga_> | yes |
| 20:16 | <karlcow> | http://blog.strictly-software.com/2009/10/windowevent-support-cross-browser.html |
| 21:16 | <karlcow> | firefox 4.0b7 & opera 11 do not support window.event but safari 5.0.3 supports it. |
| 21:20 | <karlcow> | ah no. Firefox supports it too. |
| 21:20 | <karlcow> | (if my test is not wrong) |
| 23:31 | <Yuhong> | So what will happen to www-html and www-html-editor now that XHTML2 is dead? |