| 00:33 | <annevk> | i'm not really |
| 00:33 | <annevk> | uncharted 2 is addictive |
| 00:37 | <TabAtkins> | Ah, kk. Response about what CSSOM needs out of a propdef, then? |
| 00:47 | <annevk> | nothing I think |
| 00:47 | <TabAtkins> | Kk, cool. |
| 00:47 | <annevk> | ooh, I guess a few things |
| 00:47 | <annevk> | like serialization and such |
| 00:47 | <annevk> | kind of depends on how we do things |
| 00:47 | <TabAtkins> | Well, that's not defined in the propdef table. |
| 00:47 | <TabAtkins> | Specs should define that, of course, but in a separate section. |
| 00:48 | <annevk> | and I guess what interfaces the property implements |
| 00:49 | <TabAtkins> | Oh, btw, we're going to have a team start an experimental implementation of CSSOM Values early next year. What's the latest version of your proposal? |
| 00:49 | <annevk> | http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom/ ? |
| 00:49 | <annevk> | plus some emails |
| 00:49 | <annevk> | there's nothing new |
| 00:49 | <annevk> | since last time since I'm awaiting impls |
| 00:49 | <annevk> | so that sounds great :) |
| 00:50 | <TabAtkins> | Ah, great. I didn't realize there was a difference between the dev and public version of CSSOM currently. |
| 00:50 | <annevk> | what is the public version? |
| 00:50 | annevk | is confused |
| 00:51 | <TabAtkins> | Oh, hrm. I guess there isn't one. In that case, I just didn't look down in that section before. |
| 16:21 | <espadrine> | Hello, does anyone know if there is a way to make firebug work on the latest minefield? |
| 16:22 | <espadrine> | It yells at me: "Firebug is incompatible with Minefield 4.0b9pre" |
| 16:28 | <smaug____> | espadrine: better to ask in moznet #firebug |
| 19:23 | <karlcow> | confused |
| 19:24 | <karlcow> | http://www.google.com/preferences |
| 19:24 | <karlcow> | give the choice between html, pda, xhtml |
| 19:24 | <karlcow> | I was curious about what they mean by xhtml |
| 19:24 | <karlcow> | and it seems… they still send html |
| 19:25 | <Philip`> | I think it only has any effect on mobile devices, or something |
| 19:26 | <karlcow> | which means that Google thinks Opera browsers == Mobile |
| 19:30 | <miketaylr> | shocking |
| 20:33 | <karlcow> | not sure the discussion about void elements make sense at all and help understand the TF |
| 21:37 | <TabAtkins> | karlcow: No, it doesn't. It's a trivial and unimportant syntax nitpick. |
| 21:47 | <karlcow> | I would be more interested to see if there are issues with round trip "html5 -> xhtml5 -> html5" without losing information. |
| 22:02 | <TabAtkins> | karlcow: XML's whitespace rules are different, so there's probably some possibility of change in there. |