05:27
<Hixie>
can anyone think of a way to have a 2em gap between inline blocks on a line but _not_ at the start or end of lines if they wrap to multiple lines?
05:28
<Hixie>
can anyone think of a way to have a 2em gap between inline blocks on a line but _not_ at the start or end of lines if they wrap to multiple lines?
05:28
<Hixie>
the best i've come up with so far is to have 2em right padding and -2em right margin on the container
05:28
<Hixie>
the best i've come up with so far is to have 2em right padding and -2em right margin on the container
05:28
<Hixie>
which isn't really very neat
05:29
<Hixie>
which isn't really very neat
05:42
<Hixie>
(since it makes the container overflow)
05:43
<Hixie>
(since it makes the container overflow)
10:54
<dremy>
hi
10:55
<dremy>
hi
11:43
<david_carlisle>
Hixie: I thought you could set word-spacing:2em; on the parent and word-spacing:normal in the inline blocks, but it works in FF but Chrome doesn't seem to think the inline blocks are words...
11:44
<david_carlisle>
Hixie: I thought you could set word-spacing:2em; on the parent and word-spacing:normal in the inline blocks, but it works in FF but Chrome doesn't seem to think the inline blocks are words...
11:47
<david_carlisle>
Opera and IE agree with firefox and space the inline blocks
11:48
<david_carlisle>
Opera and IE agree with firefox and space the inline blocks
14:19
<zewt>
yuck, is firefox using different rescaling modes for images and canvas now or something
14:19
<zewt>
yuck, is firefox using different rescaling modes for images and canvas now or something
14:21
<zewt>
or... for images and images drawn and rescaled into canvas, or something like that
14:21
<zewt>
or... for images and images drawn and rescaled into canvas, or something like that
15:01
<annevk>
would be kind of interesting if we could drop floats
15:01
annevk
likes dropping features
15:01
<annevk>
would be kind of interesting if we could drop floats
15:01
annevk
likes dropping features
15:02
<zewt>
i wonder if anything supports them, given that they don't really exist in JS as far as I know
15:03
<zewt>
i wonder if anything supports them, given that they don't really exist in JS as far as I know
15:03
<zewt>
i mean, you have casting rules to make 1.0 == 1.0f in C, but I don't see how you can make that work in JS
15:03
<zewt>
i mean, you have casting rules to make 1.0 == 1.0f in C, but I don't see how you can make that work in JS
16:15
<annevk>
:(
16:15
<annevk>
mapping tables for euc-kr / big5 are all messy
16:15
<annevk>
:(
16:15
<annevk>
mapping tables for euc-kr / big5 are all messy
17:33
<hino>
��
17:33
<hino>
������ ����
17:34
<hino>
¿Í
17:34
<hino>
»ç¶÷ÀÌ ¸¹³×
17:35
<zewt>
NO CARRIER
17:35
<zewt>
NO CARRIER
17:36
<annevk>
the thing that is worst is when you generate all the valid lead and trail bytes, then decode the bunch
17:36
<annevk>
and browsers offer different numbers of code points
17:36
<annevk>
Opera and Chrome: 17724
17:36
<annevk>
the thing that is worst is when you generate all the valid lead and trail bytes, then decode the bunch
17:36
<annevk>
and browsers offer different numbers of code points
17:36
<annevk>
Opera and Chrome: 17724
17:36
<hino>
ok
17:37
<hino>
ok
17:38
<hino>
Is the original so quiet here?
17:38
<annevk>
Gecko: 17758
17:39
<hino>
Is the original so quiet here?
17:39
<annevk>
Gecko: 17758
17:39
<annevk>
(for euc-kr)
18:51
<Ms2ger>
othermaciej, lovely: http://webkitmemes.tumblr.com/post/19508068848/maciej-on-git
18:52
<Ms2ger>
othermaciej, lovely: http://webkitmemes.tumblr.com/post/19508068848/maciej-on-git
20:21
<othermaciej>
hehe
20:21
<othermaciej>
hehe
22:10
<annevk>
so at least Opera and Chrome are interoperable as far as euc-kr goes
22:10
<annevk>
except...
22:10
<annevk>
Chrome uses PUA for undefined areas and Opera uses FFFD
22:10
<annevk>
so at least Opera and Chrome are interoperable as far as euc-kr goes
22:10
<annevk>
except...
22:10
<annevk>
Chrome uses PUA for undefined areas and Opera uses FFFD
22:15
<annevk>
oh, turns out Chrome does that for only some areas, not all
22:19
<annevk>
so weird
22:20
<annevk>
so weird
22:20
<annevk>
Gecko gets 34 more code points out of the same byte stream
22:20
<annevk>
but it seems unrelated to the undefined stuff
22:20
<annevk>
Gecko gets 34 more code points out of the same byte stream
22:20
<annevk>
but it seems unrelated to the undefined stuff
22:44
<annevk>
no surrogates
22:44
<annevk>
no surrogates
23:22
<annevk>
yay found the problem
23:22
<annevk>
yay found the problem
23:22
<annevk>
for lead byte 0xC6 Gecko does not eat some trailing bytes if the resulting code point is undefined, even though the bytes are in the valid range
23:23
<annevk>
for lead byte 0xC6 Gecko does not eat some trailing bytes if the resulting code point is undefined, even though the bytes are in the valid range
23:23
<annevk>
with that change, Firefox and Opera are identical
23:23
<annevk>
booyah
23:24
<annevk>
with that change, Firefox and Opera are identical
23:24
<annevk>
booyah
23:29
<annevk>
now I need to spec it...
23:30
<annevk>
now I need to spec it...