02:28
<Hixie>
TabAtkins: because it undermines my ideal, namely that the standard should be good enough and be a close enough match to the implementors' desires that they would want to implement it without prompting
08:04
<annevk>
:(
08:04
<annevk>
DreamHost is still at MySQL 5.1
08:04
<annevk>
meaning http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/002539.html is still broken
08:27
<annevk>
so yeah, I tried putting đź’© in a blog entry and it failed miserably
09:40
<matjas>
annevk: surely they must be planning to upgrade to MySQL 5.3.3+ sometime?
09:41
<matjas>
annevk: back when my server had an outdated mysql, I just took care of it with some PHP string replacements
09:41
<matjas>
`{tetragram}` became `𝌆`, etc… annoying but at least it works
09:42
<matjas>
whenever someone left a comment using any other astral symbol, i would have to go in and add another dictionary entry – but luckily that never happened
09:44
<matjas>
also, converting your dbs and tables to utf8mb4 isn’t as simple as that blog post makes it seem
09:44
<matjas>
VARCHAR(191) is the new VARCHAR(255), for example
09:46
<matjas>
(for HTML, you could of course use character references)
09:47
<matjas>
(didn’t we talk about this before in #whatwg?)
09:57
<annevk>
matjas: we did, but I started looking into updating my stuff today
09:59
<annevk>
matjas: the comment in the MySQL documentation makes it seem as though the argument to CHAR is counting characters
10:20
<matjas>
i’d suggest using utf8mb4_unicode_ci instead of utf8mb4_bin, though
10:20
<matjas>
why would anyone want to use utf8mb4_bin?
10:21
<matjas>
i might do a write-up on how i converted my stuff
10:21
<matjas>
in case it helps anyone
10:46
<annevk>
matjas: I'm not actually using MySQL for anything other than dumb storage so it doesn't matter much for me I guess
10:46
<annevk>
at least not at the moment
10:47
<annevk>
matjas: but how to convert existing stuff and how to set up new stuff is always good to have given the rotten defaults :/
11:23
<Velmont>
matjas: So it's on mainline, I guess you got my email(?)
14:06
<matjas>
Velmont: huh?
15:21
<Velmont>
matjas: The var var, for, while; fix :-)
15:45
<zewt>
i wish all of the "reflected the content attribute of the same name" bits would link to said bits, since that's where I always land
15:48
<zewt>
http://www.jwz.org/blog/2012/07/non-bouncy-layouts/ i'd have expected setting img @width and @height to do this, but it doesn't :(
15:49
<zewt>
eg. saying <img width=800 height=200 style="width: 100%; height: auto;"> to always layout as if it had an 800x200 image loaded
15:51
<zewt>
(probably throw in display: inline-block for completeness, not that that helps)
21:33
<matjas>
Velmont: ah, got confused by your IRC nick, sorry — yeah I got the mail, thanks!