| 08:43 | <Ms2ger> | <base href="http://localhost/xhr/resources/">; |
| 08:43 | Ms2ger | wonders if anybody passes this test |
| 09:19 | <webben> | hsivonen: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Aug/0098.html - did you mean "because people who evaluate the quality of markup |
| 09:19 | <webben> | generators *cannot* be trusted" |
| 09:19 | <webben> | ? |
| 09:21 | <Ms2ger> | That's quite the sentence |
| 10:32 | <hsivonen> | webben: oops. right. thanks. |
| 11:37 | <hsivonen> | TabAtkins: worse than Gmail saying "you" or "me" is that "me" is mislocalized in Finnish to have the opposite meaning |
| 11:37 | <hsivonen> | TabAtkins: (instead of meaning "*by* me", it's localized so that it reads "*to* me") |
| 11:38 | <hsivonen> | (well, last I checked. I use Gmail in English to avoid stuff like that) |
| 12:00 | <AryehGregor> | It's a different case? |
| 12:01 | AryehGregor | doesn't know a nontrivial amount of any language with nontrivial cases |
| 12:04 | <hsivonen> | AryehGregor: yeah, the localization gets the case wrong |
| 13:27 | <hoolter> | hey, are <script> elements allowed within <a> ones? |
| 13:31 | <AryehGregor> | hoolter, http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-a-element "Transparent, but there must be no interactive content descendant." |
| 13:31 | <AryehGregor> | <a> can contain anything its parent can, except interactive content. |
| 13:31 | <AryehGregor> | But anyway, yes. |
| 13:32 | <AryehGregor> | Anywhere you can use <a>, you can also use <script>. |
| 13:34 | <hoolter> | AryehGregor: does that mean no script tags? |
| 13:35 | <AryehGregor> | hoolter, that means yes, script tags in <a> are fine. |
| 13:35 | <hoolter> | AryehGregor: as long as no visibly represented elements of an interactive nature exist withihn the <a>? |
| 13:36 | <AryehGregor> | hoolter, <a> is not allowed to have any descendant elements that are classified as "interactive content". A full list of those is here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#interactive-content-0 |
| 14:19 | <nonge> | When lang="zxx" is stated, should one add translate="no", too? Or can/will this be inferred? |
| 14:54 | <webben> | nonge: I wouldn't expect it to be inferred; I wouldn't assume it's desirable. |
| 14:56 | <nonge> | webben, why wouldn't it be desirable? Afaik "zxx" means that it is no linguistic content; so this *can't* be translated (and it should not … think of an article number like "123-HELLO-456") |
| 14:57 | <webben> | oh sorry I thought zxx was just a metasyntactic example |
| 14:57 | <nonge> | webben, ah, I see |
| 14:58 | <AryehGregor> | nonge, I wouldn't assume browsers know what "zxx" means, no. |
| 15:02 | <nonge> | AryehGregor, okay, thanks. So one would have to add both. |
| 15:02 | <AryehGregor> | Yeah. |
| 16:36 | <zewt> | uhh |
| 16:36 | <zewt> | anyone else getting reply spam when posting to whatwg? heh |
| 16:38 | <zewt> | http://i.imgur.com/Qa9Xg.png |
| 17:41 | <zewt> | also, apparently in gmail it's impossible to mark a single email as spam; only a whole thread |
| 21:22 | <Hixie> | zewt: probably an autoreply -- is it always the same person? |
| 21:24 | <zewt> | only got it the last time, been a couple weeks since my last post before that |
| 21:25 | <Hixie> | k |
| 21:25 | <Hixie> | there are people with autoreplies on occasionally -- i post often enough that i get them all the time, but it seems to vary from person to person |
| 21:25 | <Hixie> | if there's anyone who is sending autoreplies for more than a day or two then let me know and i'll unsub them |
| 21:26 | <zewt> | the only times i see autoreplies on lists tends to be due to a direct CC, rather than a list forward |
| 21:29 | <zewt> | (of course, given that it's is a mail host that puts ads for itself with an animated gif logo in posts, it behaving unusually badly isn't exactly surprising) |
